Interaction between visual attention and visual working memory: retro - cue benefit in recognition information

Authors
saeede khosravi 1
Imanollah Bigdeli 1
Mehrdad Mazaheri 2
1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 University of Sistan and Baluchestan
Abstract
In working memory (WM) tasks, performance can be boosted by directing attention to one memory object: When a retro-cue in the retention interval indicates which object will be tested, responding is faster and more accurate (theretro-cue benefit). This study tests explanations of the retro-cue benefits in 2 experiment desined by superlab software: Experiment 1, the effect of valid and invalid retro-cues compared with no-cues were tested before the memory test. Experiment 2, We tested whether the retro-cue benefit in WM depends on sustained attention to the cued object by inserting an attention-demanding interruption task between the retro-cue and the memory test. In this quasi-experimental study, with a series of repeated measurements, 30 individual (15 for each test) from graduate students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad were selected by convenience sampling and were tested. Data analysis of variance with repeated measurements and t-test for paired samples were also analyzed. The result showed that valid retro-cue compared to the no-cue was better. Also, it was shown when visual interference was held constant, retro-cue benefits were still obtained whenever the retro-cue enabled retrieval of an object from VWM but delayed response selection. The results showed that retro-cue improved visual working memory performance.
Keywords
retro-cue
visual working memory
visual attention
retrieval
Amiri, S., Ghasemi Navab, A. & Abdolahi, M.H. (2015). Comparative Study of Working Memory Performance, Behavioral Activation System (BAS) and Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) Based on the Dimensions of Stress in Adolescents. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 4. [persion]
Arkan, A. & Yaryari, F.(2014). The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) on the
Working Memory in Healthy People. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 2. [persion]
Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126.
Awh, E., Vogel, E. K.,& Oh, S.-H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 201–208.
Berryhill, M. E., Richmond, L. L., Shay, C. S., & Olson, I. R. (2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 426-438.
Delvenne, J.-F., Cleeremans, A., and Laloyaux, C. (2010). Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention. Exp. Psychol. 57, 108–116.
Downing, P. E., & Dodds, C. M. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11,689–703.
Friedenberg, J., & Silverman, G. (2011). Cognitive science: An introduction to the study of mind. Sage.
Gilchrist, A. L., Duarte, A., & Verhaeghen, P. (2015). Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 1-12.
Gözenman, F., Tanoue, R. T., Metoyer, T., & Berryhill, M. E. (2014). Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1748.
Gressmann, M., & Janczyk, M. (2016). The (un) clear effects of invalid retro-cues. Frontiers in psychology, 7.
Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176–1194.
Heuer, A., & Schubö, A. (2016). The Focus of Attention in Visual Working Memory: Protection of Focused Representations and Its Individual Variation. PloS one, 11(4), e0154228.
Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1047.
Hollingworth, A., Matsukura, M., & Luck, S. J. (2013). Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets. Psychological Science.
Janczyk, M., and Berryhill, M. E. (2014). Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 76, 715–724.
Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2013). Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2. 242-228, (2).
Kuo, B. C., Stokes, M., & Nobre, A. C. (2012). Attention modulates maintenance of representations in visual short-term memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 51–61.
Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149–164.
Lepsien, J., Griffin, I. C., Devlin, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load. NeuroImage, 26, 733–743.
Li, Q. & Saiki, J. (2014). The effects of sequential attention shifts within visual working memory. Frontiers in psychology, 5.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(8), 391-400.
Makovski, T. (2012). Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect? Psychonomic bulletin & review, 19(3), 470-476.
Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2007). Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 14(6), 1072-1078.
Makovski, T., Sussman, R., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 369–380.
Munneke, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Spatial working memory effects in early visual cortex. Brain and Cognition, 72, 368–377.
Oberauer, K., & Lin, H.-Y. (2017). An interference model of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 124(1), 21.
Rerko, L., Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention. Memory & cognition, 42(5), 712-728.
Saed, O, )2010(. The Psychological and Biological Foundations of Memory. First edition, Tehran: Arjmand Publication.[persion]
Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? PLoS ONE, 3, e1699.
Souza, A., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Getting More From Visual Working Memory: Retro-Cues Enhance Retrieval and Protect From Visual Interference. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Irwin, D. E. (2011). Attention on our mind: The role of spatial attention in visual working memory. Acta Psychologica, 137, 248–251.
van Moorselaar, D., Olivers, C. N. L., Theeuwes, J., Lamme, V. A. F., & Sligte, I. G. (2015). Forgotten But Not Gone: Retro-Cue Costs and Benefits in a Double-Cueing Paradigm Suggest Multiple States in Visual Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92–114.