Designing, Making and Evaluating Psychometric Characteristics of the Time Perception Pattern as Metaphorical Questionnaire Based on Cognitive- Dataset Analysis in Persians

Authors
1 Institute for Cognitive Science Studies
2 clinical Psychology group, faculty of psychology and education, Kharazmi university, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Time is an abstract concept that can be understood by conceptual or cognitive metaphors. A questionnaire based on dataset and qualitative analysis has not been designed in Persian yet to investigate the metaphorical perception of different source domains with various mappings. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to design, make and evaluate the psychometric characteristics of a time perception pattern as a metaphorical questionnaire based on cognitive dataset analysis among Persian speakers. The method of this study was descriptive and psychometric, and it was a survey type of research. For cognitive dataset analysis, a set of 28 contemporary Persian texts were first selected as a targeted sample and then 405 metaphorical expressions of time were extracted in 18 metaphorical mappings. It indicated source domains as object, matter, path and place, which are the most used time source domains. Based on cognitive dataset analysis, 41 questions with a Likert scale were made for the time perception pattern. The questions of this questionnaire were evaluated by 8 cognitive linguists and 2 psychometrics. Then, inappropriate questions were deleted and other questions were corrected or replaced, and at the end of the content, the validity index of the 30 remaining questions were calculated. This questionnaire was completed by 150 Persian speakers (with a bachelor’s degree and above) selected by at-reach sampling. The results showed that there was a reliability coefficient by using Cronbach’s alpha for the whole questionnaire and its components. Moreover, the results of factor analysis indicated that there were three factors of matter, place and object, which explained 37.12 % of the total variance. As a result, the time perception pattern as a metaphorical questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument in the case of Persian speakers.



Keywords

Bentler, PM. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2):238–246.
Burr, D. & Morrone, C. (2006). Time Perception: Space–Time in the Brain. Current biology, 16(19): 847-849.
Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. L. Erlbaum. Edinburgh university press.
Feldman, J. & Narayanan, S. (2014). Affordances, actionab ility, simulation, in Proceedings of the Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning Workshop, Wadern: Dagstuhl.
Fontes, R. Ribeiro, J. Gupta, D. Machado, D. Lopes-Júnior, F. Magalhães, F. Bastos, VH. Rocha, K. Marinho, V. Lima, G. Velasques, B. Ribeiro, P. Orsini, M. Pessoa, B. Araujo Leite, MA. & Teixeira, S. (2016). Time Perception Mechanisms at Central Nervous System. Neurol International. 8(1): 14-22.
Fuhrman, O. Mc Cormick, K. Chen, E. Jiang, H., Shu, D. Mao, S. & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forced shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive science. 35(7): 1305-1328.
Fuhrman, O. Mc Cormick, K. Chen, E. Jiang, H. Shu, D. Mao, S. & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forced shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive science, 35(7), 1305-1328.
Gage, N. Baars, B. (2018). Fundamentals of Cognitive Neuroscience (2Ed). Academic Press.
Ghassemzadeh, H. (2013). Metaphor and cognition. Arjman Publisher. [Persian]. Kiverstein, J. (2012). The Meaning of Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4):740-758.
Kline, RB. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3nd Ed). Guilford Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2015) Where Metaphors Come from. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor, Oxford University Press.
Kranjec, A., & McDonough, L. (2011). The implicit and explicit embodiment of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3): 735-748.
Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain's metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Front Hum Neuroscience. 8: 958. Doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958.
Lakoff, G. Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Poppel, E. (2004). Lost in time: historical foundation and the 3-second-window of temporal integration. Acta Neurobiologica, 64(3) 295-301.
Raykov. T. & Marcoulides, GA. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2 Ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Santiago, J. Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E. et al (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14 (3):512-516.
Zhou, Y. & Fan, Y. (2015). A contrastive study of temporal spatial metaphor between Chinese & attention. Theory & practice in language studies, 5(1): 119-218.