اثر فشار (کنترل شده و نتیجه) بر زمان واکنش زنجیره ای

نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه پیام نور بروجن
2 دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
چکیده
در این پژوهش تأثیر فشارهای روانی بر عملکرد زمان واکنش زنجیره ای مورد آزمایش قرار گرفت. در این تحقیق 75 نفر آزمودنی راست دست، به صورت تصادفی به سه گروه آزمایشی (هر گروه شامل 25 نفر) شامل فشار نتیجه، فشار کنترل شده و گروه کنترل تقسیم شدند. ابتدا همه گروه ها، زمان واکنش زنجیره ای را تمرین کردند و سپس مرحله آزمون با اعمال شرایط فشار برای گروه ها انجام شد. نتایج تحلیل واریانس با اندازه گیری مکرر نشان داد آزمودنی ها در گروه فشار کنترل شده افت عملکرد بیشتری را نسبت به دو گروه دیگر در مرحله آزمون به نمایش گذاشتند. شکست و موفقیت مهارت بستگی دارد به اینکه چگونه محیط اجرا، توجه را تحت تأثیر قرار می دهد و چه مقدار عملکرد مهارت به کنترل توجه بستگی دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The effects of monitoring and outcome pressure for serial reaction time task

نویسندگان English

S. Hamideh Bakhshayesh 1
Fatemeh Bahmani 1
Mohammad Kamali 2
چکیده English

In this study was tested the effect of psychology pressures on the serial reaction time task. In this research served 75 right-handed participants, were randomly assigned to three experimental condition (each group consisted of 25 students), including the outcome pressure, monitoring pressure and control groups. First of all groups practice serial reaction time and then test stage was performed by applying pressure conditions for the group. Results repeated measures ANOVA showed that subjects in the monitoring pressure group had decrement performance higher than the other groups in the test phase. Skill failure and success depends in part on how the performance environment influences attention and the extent to which skill execution depends on explicit attentional control.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

monitoring pressure
outcome pressure
working memory
Attention
serial reaction time task
Anderson J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review. 89. 369-406.
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 11. 181-185.
Ashcraft, M. H., Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 130. 224-237.
Bakhshayesh S H, Shafinia P, Neisi A, (2010). Influence on the consciousness of choking under pressure Basketball. Studies in Physical Culture and Tourism. 17(2).
Bakhshayesh, S. H., Bahmani, F., Shafie Nia P., Kamali M. (2012). Effect of self-consciousness and attention on choking under pressure on disabled athletics in open and closed skill of wheelchair basketball. Journal of disability studies. 1(2): 90-95. [Persian]
Baumeister R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 46(3): 610-620.
Baumeister, R. F., Showers, C. J. (1986). A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. European Journal of Social Psychology. 16. 361-383.
Beilock, S. L. (2008). Math performance in stressful situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 17. 339-343.
Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., McCoy, A. M., Carr, T. H. (2004). Haste does not always make waste: Expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11. 373-379.
Beilock S. L., Carr T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology. 130(4). 701-725.
Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science. 16. 101-105.
Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 8. 6–16.
Beilock, S. L., DeCaro, M. S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 33. 983-998.
Beilock, S. L., Gray R. (2007). Why do athletes choke under pressure? In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds), Handbook of Sport Psychology, 3th Champaining, IL: Human Kinetics, 19, 425-444, New Jersey, Wiley.
Beilock S. L., Kulp C. A., Holt L. E., Carr T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 133. 584–600.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror, presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 36. 324-332.
Dandy J., Brewer N., Tottman R. (2001). Self-consciousness and performance decrements within a sporting context. The Journal of Social Psychology. 141(1): 150-152.
Davis, M. H., Harvey, J. C. (1992). Declines in major league batting performance as a function of game pressure: A drive theory analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 22. 714-735.
DeCaro, M. S., Rotar, K. E., Kendra, M. S., Beilock, S. L. (2010). Diagnosing and alleviating the impact of performance pressure on mathematical problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 63. 1619-1630.
DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., Albert, N. B., Beilock, S. L. (2011). Choking Under Pressure: Multiple Routes to Skill Failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 140(3). 390-406.
DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., Beilock, S. L. (2008). Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more. Cognition. 107. 284-294.
Dohmen, T. J. (2008). Do professionals choke under pressure? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 65. 636-653.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 11. 19-23.
Eysenck, M. W., Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion. 6. 409-434.
Gimmig, D., Huguet, P., Caverni, J. P., Cury, F. (2006). Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: When performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13. 1005-1010.
Gray, R. (2004). Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: Expertise differences, choking, and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 10. 42-54.
Hardy, L., Mullen, R., Jones, G. (1996). Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress. British Journal of Psychology. 87. 621-636.
Hayes, S., Hirsch, C., Mathews, A. (2008). Restriction of working memory capacity during worry. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 117. 712-717.
Heaton, A. W., Sigall, H. (1989). The “championship choke” revisited: The role of fear and acquiring a negative identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 19. 1019-1033.
Jackson, R. C., Ashford, K. J., Norsworthy, G. (2006). Attentional focus, dispositional reinvestment, and skilled motor performance under pressure. . Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 28. 49-68.
Lewis B. P., Linder D. E. (1997). Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 23(9): 937-944.
Markman, A. B., Maddox, W. T., Worthy, D. A. (2006). Choking and excelling under pressure. Psychological Science. 17. 944-948.
Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology. 83. 343-358.
Nissen, M. J., Bullemeyer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology. 19. 1-32.
Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Fortier, M. s., Vallerand, R. J., Brikre, N. M. & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: the sport motivation scale (SMS). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 17. 35-53.
Robertson, E. M. (2007). The serial reaction time task: Implicit motor skill learning? The Journal of Neuroscience. 27. 10073-10075.
Spielberger, C. C., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R. (1970). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
Waldron, E. M., Ashby, F. G. (2001). The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 8. 168-176.
Wine J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin. 76. 92-104.
Zahedi, H., Shojahie, M., Sadeghi, H. (2011). Effect of focus of attention and skill level on basketball free-throw shot under psychological pressure. World Applied Sciences Journal. 13(5). 1047-1052.
Zeithamova, D., Maddox, W. T. (2006). Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning. Memory & Cognition. 34. 387-398.