روابط ساختاری بین اسنادهای علّی، هیجان های پیشرفت و خودنظم‌جویی تحصیلی در دانشجویان

نویسندگان
زینب فلسفین 1
امید شکری 2
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز
2 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف آزمون نقش میانجیگر هیجان­های پیشرفت در رابطه اسنادهای علّی و خودنظم­جویی تحصیلی انجام شد 270 دانشجو (93 پسر و 177 دختر) به مقیاس هیجان­های پیشرفت (پکران، گوئتز و پری، 2005)، پرسشنامه سبک اسنادی (پیترسون، سیمل، بی­یر، آبرامسون، متالسکی و سلیگمن، 1982) و مقیاس خودنظم­جویی تحصیلی (ریان و کانل، 1989) پاسخ دادند. در مطالعه حاضر، به منظور آزمون روابط ساختاری بین اسنادهای علّی، هیجان­های پیشرفت و خودنظم­جویی تحصیلی از روش آماری مدل­یابی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که رابطه بین اسنادهای علّی مثبت با هیجان­های پیشرفت مثبت، مثبت و معنادار و با هیجان­های پیشرفت منفی، منفی و معنادار؛ رابطه بین اسنادهای علی منفی با هیجان­های پیشرفت مثبت، منفی و معنادار و با هیجان­های پیشرفت منفی، مثبت و معنادار؛ در نهایت، رابطه هیجان­های پیشرفت مثبت با خودنظم­جویی تحصیلی مثبت و معنادار و رابطه هیجان­های پیشرفت منفی با خودنظم­جویی تحصیلی منفی و معنادار بود. همچنین، نتایج نشان داد که الگوی مفروض واسطه­مندی هیجان­های پیشرفت مثبت و منفی در رابطه اسنادهای علّی و خودنظم­جویی تحصیلی با داده­ها برازش مطلوبی داشت. علاوه بر این، نتایج نشان داد که در هر دو مدل واسطه­مندی هیجان های پیشرفت مثبت و منفی، تمامی وزن­های رگرسیونی از لحاظ آماری معنادار بودند و در مدل­های واسطه­مندی هیجان­های پیشرفت مثبت و منفی به ترتیب 25 و 21 درصد از پراکندگی خودنظم­جویی تحصیلی تبیین شد. نتایج مطالعه حاضر با تاکید بر واسطه­مندی هیجان­های پیشرفت مثبت و منفی به طور تجربی از آموزه­های نظریه اسناد به عنوان یک نظریه شناختی انگیزش پیشرفت تحصیلی حمایت کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
واژه‌های کلیدی اسنادهای علّی
خودنظم‌جویی تحصیلی
نظریه اسناد
نظریه کنترل ـ ارزش هیجان‌های پیشرفت

عنوان مقاله English

Structural Relationships between Causal Attributions, Achievement Emotions and Academic Self-Regulation among University Students

نویسندگان English

Zeynab Falsafin 1
Omid SHokri 2
چکیده English

This study examined the mediating effect of positive and negative achievement emotions on the relationship between causal attributions and academic self-regulation among university students. On a sample consisting of 270 students (93 male 177 female) were administrated the achievement emotion questionnaire (Pekrun, Goetz & Perry, 2005).), attributin style questionnaire (Peterson, Semel, Beayer, Abramson, Metalsky & Seligman, 1982) and academic self-regulation scale (Ryan & Connell, 1989). Structural equation modeling was used to assess the mediating effects model of achievement emotions on the relationship between causal attributions and academic self-regulation. results showed that there is a positive significant correlation between adaptive attribution style with positive achievement emotions and a positive significant correlation between nonadaptive attribution style with negative achievement emotions and positive significant correlation between positive achievement emotions with self-regulation and negative correlation between negative emotions and academic self-regulation. Results also indicated that the relationship between adaptive and non-adaptive attribution styles and academic self-regulation by positive and negative achievement emotions is mediated. All of the regression weights in the both models were statistically significant and in the the mediating model of positive and negative achievement emotions, models' predictors accounted for 25% and 21% of the variance in academic self-regulation, respectively. In sum, the results emphysising on the mediating role of achievement emotions, provide further support for the attribution theory.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

causal attributions
academic self-regulation
attribution theory
control-value theory of achievement emotions
Artino, A. R., & Jones, K. D. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 170–175.
Basturk, S., & Yavuz, I. (2010). Investigating causal attributions of success and failure on mathematics instructions of students in Turkish high schools. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2), 1940-1943.
Buric, I., & Soric, I. (2012). The role of test hope and hopelessness in self-regulated learning: Relations between volitional strategies, cognitive appraisals and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 523–529.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1-53.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Cohn, M. A. (2008). Positive emotions. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 777–796). (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Goetz, T., Cronjaeger, H., Frenzel, a. C., Ludtke, O., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Academic self-concept and emotion relations: Domain specificity and age effects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 44–58.
Goetz, T., Nett, U. E., Martiny, s. E., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. Dettmers, S., & Trautwein, U. (2012). Students' emotions during homework: Structures, self-concept antecedents, and achievement outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 225–234.
Hawi, N. (2010). Causal attributions of success and failure made by undergraduate students in an introductory-level computer programming course. Computers & Education, 54 (4), 1127-1136.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 359–388.
Kim, C., & Hodges, C. B. (2012). Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation and achievement in an online mathematics course. Instructional Science, 40, 173–192.
King, R. B., & Gaerlan, M. J. M. (2014). High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 81–100.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
Komarraju, M., & Dial. C. (2014). Academic identity, self-efficacy, and self-esteem predict self-determined motivation and goals. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 1-8.
Martin, A. J. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 239–269.
McClure, J., Meyer, L. H., Garisch, J., Fischer, R., Weir, K. F., & Walkey, F. H. (2011). Students’ attributions for their best and worst marks: Do they relate to achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36 (2), 71-81.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publication. Thousand Oaks. London. New Dehi.
Natale, K., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2009). Children's school performance and their parents' causal attributions to ability and effort: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30 (1), 14-22.
Hsieh, P. P., & Schallert, D. L. (2008). Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates’ motivation in a foreign language course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33 (4), 513-532.
Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. Advances in Psychology, 131, 143-163.
Pekrun, R. (2005). Progress and open problems in educational emotion research. Learning and Instruction, 15, 497–506.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.
Pekrun, R. (2009). Emotions at school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 575–604). New York: Routledge.
Pekran, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (3), 383-397.
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Compass, 4, 238–255.
Peterson, C., Semel. A., von Beayer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The attribution Style Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 229- 286.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
Rusk, N., Tamir, M., & Rothbaum, F. (2011). Performance and learning goals for emotion regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 44–460.
Seifert, T. L. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46(2), 137-149.
Tuominen-SoiniN H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Achievement goal orientations and academic well-being across the transition to upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, xxx (2012) xxx–xxx.
You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers & Education, 77, 125-133.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.