خلاقیت بر مبنای متغیرهای فردی و بافتی: مقایسه نظریه و عمل

نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه خوارزمی
2 دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی و مقایسه تاثیر آموزش به دو شیوه نقشه­های مفهومی و سنتی بر یادگیری دانش­آموزان درباره مفاهیم درس شیمی­سال سوم دبیرستان است که با استفاده از نظریه فضای دانش به تجزیه و تحلیل آن پرداخته شده است. از طرح نیمه آزمایشی به صورت پیش­آزمون و پس­آزمون با گروه کنترل استفاده شد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه دانش­آموزان سال سوم یکی از دبیرستان­های پسرانه شهرستان ایلام (250 نفر) بود. نمونه­گیری به شیوه در دسترس انجام شد. تعداد دانش­آموزان هر یک از این دو گروه 64 نفر بود. دو گروه با دو شیوه تدریس کاوشگری و روش تدریس سنتی تحت آموزش قرارگرفتند. برای گردآوری داده­ها از آزمون­های یادگیری و نگرش­سنج محقق­ساخته استفاده شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها ازنظریه فضای دانش و نر­افزار­آماری پاتر استفاده شده و برای مقایسه میانگین گروه­ها از آزمون تی استفاده شد. یافته­ها نشان داد تفاوت نگرش در دو گروه معنی­دار است و ساختارهای دانش گروه کاوشگری منسجم­تر بوده و مسیر بحرانی آموزش آن متفاوت از مسیر گروه سنتی است.


کلیدواژه‌ها

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1999). How to kill creativity. In Harvard business review on breakthrough thinking (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Bernardo, A. B., Zhang, L. F., & Callueng, C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 149–163.
Chen, J. K., & Chen, I. S. (2010). Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 1981–1990.
Civil registration organization, frequency of naming. Retrieved 10 September 2015 from https://www.sabteahval.ir/default.aspx?tabid=1383 [Persian]
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY: Harper Collins.
Dawson, V. L., D’Andrea, T., Affinito, R., & Westby, E. L. (1999). Predicting creative behavior: A re-examination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 57–66.
Delavar, A. (2015). Theoretical and practical foundations of research in human and social science, Tehran: Roshd. [Persian]
Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1060–1069.
Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.
Hennessey, B. A. (2010). The creativity–motivation connection. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 342–365). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hooman, H. A. (2014). Multivariate data analysis in behavioral research, Tehran: Peik farhang. [Persian]
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), the nature of creativity (pp. 202–219). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kim, H., Cramond, B., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and intelligence. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 395–412). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kogan, N. (1973). Creativity and cognitive style: A life-span perspective. In P. B. Baltes & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 145–178). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, M., & Erdogan, I. (2007). The effect of Science-Technology-Society Teaching on students’ attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1315-1327.
Lin, C., Hu, W. Adey, P., & Shen, J. (2003). The influence of CASE on scientific creativity. Research in Science Education, 33, 143-162.
Liu, P., Zhang, X., & Shi, J. (2009, August). A Comparison of Perceptions on the Investment Theory of Creativity between Chinese and American. In Natural Computation, 2009. ICNC'09. Fifth International Conference on (Vol. 5, pp. 217-221). IEEE.
Lubart, T. I. (2010). Cross cultural perspectives on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 265–278). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward & R. A. Finke (Eds.), the creative cognition approach (pp. 269–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (p. 450). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mellou, E. (1996). The two-conditions view of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(2), 126–149.
Niu, W. (2007). Individual and environmental influences on Chinese student creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 151-175.
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and school influences on student creativity: The case of China. Psychology in the Schools, 40(1), 103-114.
Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The psycho economic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131–147.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press.
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational psychology review, 7, 243-267.
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2006). Research methods in behavioral science, Tehran: Agah. [Persian]
Schank, R. C. (1988). Creativity as a mechanical process. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 220–238). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1983). Discovery, invention, and development: Human creative thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Part 2: Physical Sciences), 80(14), 4569–4571.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Creativity is a habit. Education Week, 25(24), 47–64.
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3-12.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688.
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Walberg, H. (1988). Creativity and talent as learning. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), the nature of creativity (pp. 340–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.
Williamson, B. (2001). Creativity, the corporate curriculum and the future: A case study. Futures, 33(6), 541–555.
Zhang, L. F. (2013). Conceptions of creativity among Hong Kong university students. Educational psychology, 33 (5), 521-539.
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Revisiting the investment theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 229-238.