اثرهای تبیین‌گری و دانش قبلی بر بار شناختی و انتقال یادگیری در محیط‌های یادگیری چندرسانه‌ای مبتنی بر رایانه

Ainsworth, S. H. & Burcham, S. (2007). The impact of text coherenceon learning by self-explanation. Learning and Instruction, 17, 286-303.
Ainsworth, S. H. & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science 27, 669–681.
Baddeley, A. (1998). Recent developments in working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8,234-238.
Betrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. Chapter proposed to R.E. Mayer (Ed.) the cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.
Berthold, K., Eysink, T., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37(4), 345-363.
Cham. T. H., Bassok,M., Lewis,M.W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), (pp.161-238) Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Crippen, K.J. & Earl, B.L. (2007). The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving and self-efficacy. Computers & Education 49, 809–821.,
Gerjets, P. & Scheiter, K. & Catrambone, R. (2006). Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? Learning and Instruction 16, 104-121.
Hassanabadi, H. R (1387). Differential effects of the methods of presentation and the role of individual cognitive differences on learning outcomes and academic course cognitive load in multimedia learning environments. Educational Psychology PhD thesis, Tehran University. [Persian]
Hassanabadi, H. R & Nuri, M (1391). Self-explaining and Instructional explanation: Two helpful techniques to use the method of solution of worked-out example step by step. . Educational Psychology Master's Thesis, kharazmi University. [Persian]
Hassanabadi, H. R., Robatjazi, E. S. & Pakdaman Savoji, A. (2011). Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1481-1487.
Hilbert, T.S. & Renkl, A. (2009). Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 267–274.
Johnson, C.I. & Mayer, R.E. (2010). Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 1246–1252.
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539.
Kalyuga, S. (2009). Cognitive load and instructional design (translated by Amit Teimuri, M. H., Musa Ramezani, S. & Velayati, E. (1391)). Tehran: Avayenoor. [Persian]
Kavyan Mobarakeh, Z., Hassanabadi, H. R & Naderi, N. (1392). Increasing germane cognitive load problem solving time in students. Paper presented at the fifth international conference of cognitive science of Shahid Beheshti university. [Persian]
Lin, L.(2011). Learning with Multimedia: Are Visual Cues and Self-Explanation Prompts Effective ? A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy. Arizona state university.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer
(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. (pp. 31-48). NewYork, NY, US: Cambridge University Press
Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 156-163.
Moreno, R. (2006). When worked examples don't work: is cognitive load theory at an impasse? Learning and instruction, 16,170-181.
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self- explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556.
Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2005). The self-explanation principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 271-286). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
Schworm, S. & Renk, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers & Education 46, 426–445.
Seif, A. A. (1387). Measurement, assessment and training evaluation. Tehran: Doran. [Persian]
Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction 16. 165-169.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Tabatabaei, S. M. (1389). Effects of Content Format on the transmission of problem solving and cognitive load. . Educational Psychology PhD thesis, Tehran University. [Persian]
Tabatabaei, S. M., Ejei, J., Hassanabadi, H. R & Abdous, F. (1392). Explanation in Incomplete worked examples: Is incresing germane cognitive load and decreasing intirinsic cognitive load simultaneously possible? Journal of Psychology, 17, 260-274. [Persian]
Wong, R. M. F., Lawson, M. J., & Keeves, J. (2002). The effects of self- explanation training on students' problem solving in high-school mathematics. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 233-262.
Yeh, Y.F. & Chen, M.C. & Hung, P.H & Hwang, G.J. (2010). Optimal self-explanation prompt design in dynamic multi-representational. Computers & Education 54, 1089–1100.