تأثیر تمرین کم‌ خطا، پرخطا و مقیاس‎بندی تجهیزات بر دقت اجرای حرکتی کودکان در شرایط فشار روان‌شناختی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری یادگیری حرکتی دانشگاه تهران
2 استادیار رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه تهران
3 دانشیار رفتار حرکتی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر، مقایسه روشهای یادگیری کم‏ خطا، پرخطا و مقیاسبندی تجهیزات بر دقت پرتاب بسکتبال کودکان در شرایط فشار روان‌شناختی بود. بدین منظور 50 دانشآموز پسر مقطع ابتدایی 10-12 سال به‌طور تصادفی در پنج گروه آزمایشی تمرین با روش کم‏ خطا، پر خطا، تجهیزات استاندارد، تجهیزات مقیاسبندیشده و ترکیبی قرار گرفتند. پس از 5 جلسه اکتساب، آزمون یادداری و انتقال (تحت‌فشار روان‌شناختی) در حضور تماشاگران و ارزیاب اجرا شد. قبل از آزمون یادداری و بلافاصله بعد از آزمون انتقال، پرسشنامه اضطراب حالتی رقابتی- 2 توسط شرکتکنندگان تکمیل گردید. دادهها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس مرکب و t زوجی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد اجرای گروه تمرین با تجهیزات استاندارد (اندازه کامل) در آزمون انتقال نسبت به آزمون یادداری، افت معنی‎داری داشته است. بااین‌وجود در گروه‏های تمرین با تجهیزات مقیاسبندیشده افت معنی‏داری بین دو آزمون مشاهده نشد. با توجه به نتایج پژوهش حاضر به نظر میرسد استفاده از تجهیزات مقیاسبندیشده در روشی مشابه با تمرین کم‏ خطا باعث یادگیری پنهان دانش آموزان شده و از افت اجرا تحت شرایط فشار روان‌شناختی ممانعت می‎کند. بنابراین میتواند به‌عنوان روشی مناسب برای آموزش مهارتهای حرکتی برای کودکان استفاده شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Errorless, Error full and scaling equipment on Accuracy of children’s motor performance under Stress

نویسندگان English

Mohamad Sohbatiha 1
Ali Akbar Jaberimoqadam 2
Mehdi Shahbazi 3
Mehdi Shahbazi 3
1 Ph.D. Student in Motor Learning, University of Tehran
2 Assistant Professor in Motor Behavior, University of Tehran
3 Associate Professor in Motor Behavior, University of Tehran
چکیده English

The aim of this study was to compare the effects Errorless, Error full and scaling equipment methods on accuracy of the throw basketball under stress in children. 50 elementary boy students 10-12 years randomly divided into five groups (errorless, error full, Training with scaling and standard equipment, scaling equipment and combined). After 5 session in acquisition, retention and transfer (under stress) tests were conducted. Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 was filled out by participants before retention and after transfer tests. Data was analyzed with dependent t-test and mixed ANOVA. Significant reduction were found between retention and transfer tests in training with standard equipment group. Performance of standard equipment group declined under pressure. However, performance Decrement in other groups was not significant. In general, according the results of this study, the use of scaled equipment by children lead to implicit learning in the same manner as the errorless learning paradigm and prevents choking under stress. Therefore, it can be used as a proper method for teaching motor skills in children.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

choking
scaled equipment
Implicit Learning
Errorless practice
Arias JL, Argudo FM, Alonso JI. (2012). Effect of basketball mass on shot performance among 9–11 year-old male players. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching;7(1):69-79.
Asgari, Z., & Abdoli, A. (2014). The relationship between the conscious reinvestment and athletic performance under Psychological pressure. Testing the theory of conscious reinvestment. Motor behavior, 6(16), 29-42. [Persian]
Baumeister RF, Showers CJ. (1986). A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. European Journal of Social Psychology;16(4):361-83.
Baumeister RF. (1984). Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of personality and social psychology;46(3):610.
Beilock SL, Carr TH. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of experimental psychology: General;130(4):701.
Beilock SL, Gray R. (2007). Why do athletes choke under pressure? Handbook of sport psychology: 425-444.
Buszard T, Farrow D, Reid M, Masters RS. (2014). Scaling sporting equipment for children promotes implicit processes during performance. Consciousness and cognition;30:247-55.
Capio C, Poolton J, Sit C, Eguia K, Masters R. (2013). Reduction of errors during practice facilitates fundamental movement skill learning in children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research;57(4):295-305.
Capio C, Poolton J, Sit C, Holmstrom M, Masters R. (2013). Reducing errors benefits the field‐based learning of a fundamental movement skill in children. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports;23(2):181-8.
Davids KW, Button C, Bennett SJ. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach: Human kinetics. 144-147.
Edwards WH. (2010). Motor learning and control: from theory to practice: Cengage Learning. 152-156.
Eysenck MW, Calvo MG. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion;6(6):409-34.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
Geukes K, Mesagno C, Hanrahan SJ, Kellmann M. (2012). Testing an interactionist perspective on the relationship between personality traits and performance under public pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise;13(3):243-50.
Ghamari, A., Mohamadi, J., & Mohamadi, M. (2015). The effect of errorless and error full practice on learning and transfer of dart throwing skill in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. . Motor behavior, 7(21), 111-126. [Persian]
Hardy L, Mullen R, Jones G. (1996). Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress. British Journal of psychology;87(4):621-36.
Hardy L, Parfitt G. (1991). A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. British journal of psychology;82(2):163-78.
Hill DM, Hanton S, Matthews N, Fleming S. (2010). Choking in sport: A review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology;3(1):24-39.
Hill DM, Shaw G. (2013). A qualitative examination of choking under pressure in team sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise;14(1):103-10.
Kachel K, Buszard T, Reid M. (2015). The effect of ball compression on the match-play characteristics of elite junior tennis players. Journal of sports sciences;33(3):320-6.
Kashani, V., & Mostafayi Far, E. (2016). Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. Sports psychology studies, 16, 35-54. [Persian]
Kinrade NP, Jackson RC, Ashford KJ. (2015). Reinvestment, task complexity and decision making under pressure in basketball. Psychology of Sport and Exercise;20:11-9.
Lam W, Maxwell J, Masters R. (2009). Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes. Journal of Sports Sciences;27(2):179-91.
Lam W, Maxwell J, Masters R. (2010). Probing the allocation of attention in implicit (motor) learning. Journal of Sports Sciences;28(14):1543-54.
Lam WK, Maxwell JP, Masters R. (2009). Analogy learning and the performance of motor skills under pressure. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology;31(3):337-57.
Liao C-M, Masters RS. (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. Journal of sports sciences;19(5):307-19.
Masters R, Poolton J, Maxwell J. (2008). Stable implicit motor processes despite aerobic locomotor fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition;17(1):335-8.
Masters RS. Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: (1992). The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British journal of psychology;83(3):343-58.
Maxwell J, Masters R, Kerr E, Weedon E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A;54(4):1049-68.
Mesagno C, Mullane-Grant T. (2010). A comparison of different pre-performance routines as possible choking interventions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology;22(3):343-60.
Mullen R, Hardy L, Oldham A. (2007). Implicit and explicit control of motor actions: revisiting some early evidence. British Journal of Psychology;98(1):141-56.
Mullen R, Hardy L. (2000). State anxiety and motor performance: Testing the conscious processing hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences;18(10):785-99.
Nicholls AR, Jones L. (2013). Psychology in sports coaching: theory and practice. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching;8(1):255-7.
Otten M. (2009). Choking vs. clutch performance: A study of sport performance under pressure. Journal of sport and exercise psychology;31(5):583-601.
Oudejans RR, Pijpers JR. (2009). Training with anxiety has a positive effect on expert perceptual–motor performance under pressure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology;62(8):1631-47.
Perreault ME, French KE. (2015). External-focus feedback benefits free-throw learning in children. Research quarterly for exercise and sport;86(4):422-7.
Poolton J, Masters R, Maxwell J. (2005). The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Human movement science;24(3):362-78.
Poolton J, Masters R, Maxwell J. (2007). Passing thoughts on the evolutionary stability of implicit motor behaviour: Performance retention under physiological fatigue. Consciousness and cognition;16(2):456-68.
Salehi, H. (2011). The effects of contextual interference on the method and result of the shooting basketball performance. Motor Behavior and sport psychology, 7, 45-62. [Persian]
Shojaei M, Daneshfar A. (2014). Motor Development. Tehran. Emam Hosein University: 219-222
Taherpouri, T., Shafinia, P., & Zarqami, M. (2014). The effect of eye and hands laterality on learning of free throw in Basketball. Motor Learning and development, 8(3), 413-434. [Persian]
Timmerman E, De Water J, Kachel K, Reid M, Farrow D, Savelsbergh G. (2015). The effect of equipment scaling on children’s sport performance: the case for tennis. Journal of sports sciences;33(10):1093-100.
van Abswoude F, Santos-Vieira B, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B. (2015). The influence of errors during practice on motor learning in young individuals with cerebral palsy. Research in developmental disabilities;45:353-64.
Wallace HM, Baumeister RF, Vohs KD. (2005). Audience support and choking under pressure: A home disadvantage? Journal of sports sciences;23(4):429-38.