مدل ساختاری کارکردهای اجرایی و روابط فرازناشویی با بررسی نقش میانجی خودکنترلی

نویسندگان
راضیه خرم آبادی
زهره سپهری شاملو
جواد صالحی فدردی
ایمان الله بیگدلی
دانشگاه فردوسی
چکیده
هدف مطالعه حاضر ارائه مدل ساختاری گرایش به روابط فرازناشویی باکارکردهای اجرایی با میانجیگری خودکنترلی می­باشد. روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع همبستگی- معادلات ساختاری بوده است. تعداد 210 نفرنمونه به شیوه نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. در شرایط آزمایشگاهی، ابتدا برای سنجش کارکردهای اجرایی 4 آزمون کامپیوتری ویسکانسین، برو نرو، چند محرک پیشین( ان بک ) و استروپ را انجام داده و سپس پرسشنامه های خودکنترلی تانجی و گرایش به روابط فرازناشویی واتلی را پر کردند. تحلیل مدل با روش معادلات ساختاری از نوع رگرسیونی نشان داد که مدل دارای برازش مناسبی می باشد و به طورکلی کارکردهای اجرایی و خودکنترلی 0/12 از واریانس گرایش به روابط فرازناشویی را مورد پیش­ بینی قرار می­دهند. همچنین کارکردهای اجرایی شامل بازداری (0/13-)، انعطاف ­پذیری(0/13-) و حافظه فعال(0/16-) و خودکنترلی(0/10-) اثر مستقیمی بر روابط فرازناشویی دارند. همچنین کارکردهای اجرایی بازداری (0/23-)، انعطاف­ پذیری(0/11-) و حافظه فعال(0/27-) با میانجیگری نقش خودکنترلی دارای اثر غیرمستقیمی بر روابط فرازناشویی می باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
روابط فرازناشویی
خیانت
کارکردهای اجرایی
کنترل اجرایی
کنترل شناختی
خود کنترلی

عنوان مقاله English

Structural model of executive function and extramarital relationship with mediating role of self-control

نویسندگان English

Razieh Khorram Abadi
Zohre Sepehri Shamloo
Javad Salehi Fadardi
Imanollah Bigdeli
Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad
چکیده English

The purpose of this study is presentation the structural model of executive functions and extramarital relationship with mediating role of self­­­-control. The 210 samples were selected by convenience sampling. In experimental situation, for assessing executive function participants did computerized exams include: Stroop, Wisconsin, Go No Go and N- Back and completed self-control questionnaire of Tangney and attitudes toward infidelity scale of Whatley. Data was analyzed through regression, structural equation modeling. Model has a suitable fit. Results shows that executive functions includes inhibition(-0/13), task switching(-0/13) ,working memory(-0/16) and self-control(-0/10)had direct effect on extra marital relationship. Executive functions includes inhibition(-0/23), task switching(-0/11) ,working memory(-0/27) had indirect effect on extra marital relationship with mediation of self-control.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Extra marital relationship
Infidelity
Executive Functions
Executive Control
Cognitive Control
Self-control
Allen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12(2), 101-130.
Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample. Journal of family psychology, 15(4), 735.
Balliet, D., & Pronk, T. M. (2013). Personality, self-control, and welfare-tradeoff ratios in revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 16-17.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current directions in psychological science, 16(6), 351-355.
Brown, E. M. (2001). Patterns Of Infidelity And Their Treatment: Tailor & Francis.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological review, 100(2), 204.
Ciarocco, N. J., Echevarria, J., & Lewandowski Jr, G. W. (2012). Hungry for love: The influence of self-regulation on infidelity. The Journal of social psychology, 152(1), 61-74.
Eaves, S. H., & Robertson-Smith, M. (2007). The relationship between self-worth and marital infidelity: A pilot study. The Family Journal, 15(4), 382-386.
Fenwick, M. E., Kubas, H. A., Witzke, J. W., Fitzer, K. R., Miller, D. C., Maricle, D. E., . . . Hale, J. B. (2016). Neuropsychological profiles of written expression learning disabilities determined by concordance-discordance model criteria. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 5(2), 83-96.
Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: an interdependence analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(2), 263.
Fricker, J., & Moore, S. (2006). Predicting infidelity: The role of attachment styles, lovestyles, and the Investment Model: Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia.
Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Self-regulation and sexual restraint: Dispositionally and temporarily poor self-regulatory abilities contribute to failures at restraining sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 173-186.
Gordon, K. C. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: Preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(3), 179-199.
Gordon, K. C., & Baucom, D. H. (1999). A forgiveness-based intervention for addressing extramarital affairs. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 6, 382–399.
Gordon, K. C., Baucom, D. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2004). An integrative intervention for promoting recovery from extramarital affairs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(2), 213-231.
Graham, S. M., Negash, S., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2016). Problem drinking and extradyadic sex in young adult romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 35(2), 152-170.
Hamburg, M. E., & Pronk, T. M. (2015). Believe you can and you will: The belief in high self-control decreases interest in attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 30-35.
Hertlein, K. M., Wetchler, J. L., & Piercy, F. P. (2005). Infidelity: an overview. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 4(2-3), 5-16.
Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Friese, M., Wiers, R. W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(4), 962.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(3), 174-180.
Jeanfreau, M. M., Jurich, A. P., & Mong, M. D. (2014). An examination of potential attractions of women's marital infidelity. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(1), 14-28.
Jeanfreau, M. M., Jurich, A. P., & Mong, M. D. (2014). Risk factors associated with women’s marital infidelity. Contemporary Family Therapy, 36(3), 327-332.
Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 615.
Karremans, J. C., Pronk, T. M., & Wal, R. C. (2015). Executive control and relationship maintenance processes: An empirical overview and theoretical integration. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(7), 333-347.
Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Psychology Press.
Marín, R. A., Christensen, A., & Atkins, D. C. (2014). Infidelity and behavioral couple therapy: Relationship outcomes over 5 years following therapy. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3(1), 1.
Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Archives of sexual behavior, 40(5), 971-982.
Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Archives of sexual behavior, 40(5), 971-982.
McIntyre, J. C., Barlow, F. K., & Hayward, L. E. (2015). Stronger sexual desires only predict bold romantic intentions and reported infidelity when self‐control is low. Australian Journal of Psychology, 67(3), 178-186.
Negash, S., Veldorale-Brogan, A., Kimber, S. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2016). Predictors of extradyadic sex among young adults in heterosexual dating relationships: a multivariate approach. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 1-20.
Negash, S., Veldorale-Brogan, A., Kimber, S. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2016). Predictors of extradyadic sex among young adults in heterosexual dating relationships: a multivariate approach. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 1-20.
Pronk, T. M., & Karremans, J. C. (2014). Does executive control relate to sacrificial behavior during conflicts of interests? Personal Relationships, 21(1), 168-175.
Pronk, T. M., Karremans, J. C., & Wigboldus, D. H. (2011). How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful. Journal of personality and social psychology, 100(5), 827.
Pronk, T. M., & Righetti, F. (2015). How executive control promotes happy relationships and a well-balanced life. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 14-17.
Tangney, J., Baumeister, R., & Boone, A. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of personality, 72(2), 271-324.
Tangney, J. P., BOONE, A. L., & BAUMEISTER, R. F. (2018). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success Self-Regulation and Self-Control (pp. 181-220): Routledge.
Ueda, R., Yanagisawa, K., Ashida, H., & Abe, N. (2017). Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(6), 1210-1220.
Ueda, R., Yanagisawa, K., Ashida, H., & Abe, N. (2018). Executive control and faithfulness: only long-term romantic relationships require prefrontal control. Experimental brain research, 1-8.
Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2010). How does cognitive control reduce anger and aggression? The role of conflict monitoring and forgiveness processes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(5), 830.