Mental Timeline in Persian Speakers’ Co-Speech Gestures Based on Lakoff and Johnson’s Conceptual Metaphor Theory

Authors
Hossein Matoori
Elkhas Veysi
Bahman Gorjian
Mehran Memari
Abstract
One of the well-known conceptual metaphors is the metaphor of "time as space". Time as an abstract concept is conceptualized by a concrete concept like space. This conceptualization of time is also reflected in co-speech gestures. In this research, we try to find out what dimension and direction the mental timeline takes in co-speech gestures and under which metaphorical sources of space it takes place. For this purpose, six possible metaphorical sources adopted from space on three axes of sagittal, lateral, and vertical in six spatial directions were examined on the words tomorrow and yesterday. Participants were 137 students ranging in age from 18 to 30. The frequency of occurrence and the average percentage in co-speech gestures showed that the horizontal-sagittal axis back to front adopted from metaphorical-spatial source of linguistic metaphors with 55.75%; and right to left horizontal-lateral axis adopted from metaphorical-spatial source of Persian writing direction with 30.1% were the two influential factors in activating these dimensions and directions. The results of this study showed that language can play an important role in the representation of the mental timeline in co-speech gestures through the embodied sensory-motor experiences that we have from language as a conventional-cultural artifact in writing or linguistic metaphors.
Keywords
Conceptual Metaphors
Mental Timeline
Co-speech Gestures
Barsalou, L. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and cognitive processes, 18(5-6): 513-562.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(4): 577-660.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 617-645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Boot, I., & Pecher, D. (2010). Representation of categories. Experimental Psychology, 58(2): 162-170.
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1): 1-28.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive psychology, 43(1):1-22.
Burns, P., McCormack, T., Jaroslawska, A. J., O'Connor, P. A., & Caruso, E. M. (2019). Time Points: A Gestural Study of the Development of Space–Time Mappings. Cognitive science, 43(12), e12801. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12801
Casasanto, D. (2009). When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? New directions in cognitive linguistics, 24, 127-145.
Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again: MIT press.
Galton, A. (2011). Time flies but space does not: Limits to the spatialisation of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3):695-703.
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space→time metaphors. Language and cognitive processes, 17(5): 537-565.
Gibbs Jr, R. W., Gibbs, R. W., & Gibbs, J. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs Jr, R. W., Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of pragmatics, 36(7):1189-1210.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2): 301-307.
Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Are temporal concepts embodied? A challenge for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in psychology, 1, 240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00240
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh (Vol. 4): New york: Basic books.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Li, H. (2017). Time on hands: Deliberate and spontaneous temporal gestures by speakers of Mandarin. Gesture, 16(3), 396-415.
Moore, K. E. (2011). Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of FRONT in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 759-776.
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and social psychology review, 9(3), 184-211.
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in experimental social psychology, 36, 57-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36002-8.
Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25(3-4), 278-298.
Turner, M., & Lakoff, G. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Journal of Women s Health. 48(3):260-261.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
Winter, B., & Duffy, S. E. (2020). Can co-speech gestures alone carry the mental time line? Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition. 46(9):1768-1781.