حس قدرت، حس جایگاه اجتماعی و شیوه‌های جایگاه طلبی با تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی به نفع خود و به نفع دیگران

نویسندگان
حمید خانی‌پور
مهسان پورعلی
مژگان عطار
دانشگاه خوارزمی
چکیده
تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی می‌تواند هم خودخواهانه و به نفع خود و هم با هدف نفع رساندن به دیگران باشد. هدف این مطالعه بررسی نقش افتراقی حس قدرت، حس از جایگاه اجتماعی و روش‌های جایگاه‌طلبی اجتماعی شامل روش برتری و منزلت در پیش‌بینی تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی به نفع خود و به نفع دیگران بود. شرکت‌کنندگان 150 نفر از شهروندان تهرانی بودند که به صورت داوطلبانه در مطالعه شرکت کردند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از مقیاس حس قدرت، مقیاس حس جایگاه اجتماعی، مقیاس برتری-منزلت، و پرسشنامه تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد برتری به صورت مثبت و منزلت به صورت منفی با تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی به نفع خود، رابطه دارد و در مورد تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی به نفع دیگران، فقط برتری به صورت مثبت رابطه داشت. رابطه معنی‌داری بین حس قدرت و حس جایگاه اجتماعی و تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی در دو وضعیت وجود نداشت. این مطالعه از تمایز مفهومی تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی خودخواهانه یا به نفع خود و به نفع دیگران حمایت می‌کند. به نظر می‌رسد صرف قدرت و جایگاه اجتماعی عوامل مرتبط با تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی نیستند، بلکه روش‌های کسب جایگاه یعنی برتری و منزلت مکانیسم‌های روانی تعیین‌کننده‌تری در احتمال تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تصمیم‌گیری غیراخلاقی
قدرت
جایگاه اجتماعی
منزلت
برتری

عنوان مقاله English

The Relationship among the Sense of Power, the Sense of Status and Status Seeking Styles with Self-beneficial and Other-beneficial Unethical Decision-Making

نویسندگان English

Hamid Khanipur
Mahsan Pourali
Mojgan Attar
Kharazmi university
چکیده English

Unethical decision-making could be considered as both selfish and self-beneficial in addition to being aimed at benefiting others. The aim of this study was to investigate the differential relationship among the sense of power, the sense of status and status seeking styles (i.e., prestige and dominance) with two forms of unethical decision-making. Participants were 150 citizens of Tehran, who voluntary participated in this study. Data were gathered by the sense of power scale, the sense of status scale, the dominance-prestige scale, and the unethical decision-making questionnaire (self-beneficial and other-beneficial forms). The multiple regression analysis showed that dominance was positively and prestige was negatively associated with self-beneficial unethical decision-making, whereas dominance was positively associated with other-beneficial unethical decision-making. The relationship between the sense of power and the sense of status with two forms of unethical decision-making was not significant. The results of this study supported the conceptual distinction between two forms of unethical decision-making. It seems that the sense of power or the sense of status alone could not explain unethical decision-making, and status seeking styles (i.e., prestige and dominance) would be the main mental mechanisms which contribute to the tendency for unethical decision-making.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Unethical Decision-Making
Power
Social status
Dominance
Prestige
Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk‐taking. European journal of social psychology, 36(4), 511-536.
Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The Personal Sense of Power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313-344. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011. 00734.x
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3),1-29.
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(1), 103-125.
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334-347.
Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In The psychology of social status (pp. 3-27): Springer.
Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). The impact of wealth on prestige and dominance rank relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 102-108.
Cheng, J. T. (2020). Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 238-244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.10.004.
Chacón, F., Gutiérrez, G., Sauto, V., Vecina, M. L., & Pérez, A. (2017). Volunteer functions inventory: A systematic review. Psicothema, 29(3), 306-316.
Clerke, A. S., Brown, M., Forchuk, C., & Campbell, L. (2018). Association between social class, greed, and unethical behaviour: A replication study. Collabra: Psychology, 35 (4), 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.166.
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: a study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374-391.
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of personality and social psychology, 108(3), 436.
Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking: why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 110-120.
Giurge, L. M., van Dijke, M., Zheng, M. X., & De Cremer, D. (2019). Does power corrupt the mind? The influence of power on moral reasoning and self-interested behavior. The Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.003.
Hays, N. A., & Blader, S. L. (2016). To give or not to give? Interactive effects of status and legitimacy on generosity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 112(1), 17-38.
Henrich, J., Chudek, M., & Boyd, R. (2015). The Big Man Mechanism: how prestige fosters cooperation and creates prosocial leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1683), 20150013.
Hing, S., Leanne, S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., & McBride, M. V. (2007). Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(1), 67-81.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of management review, 16(2), 366-395.
Kafashan S., S. A., Griskevicius V., Barclay P. Prosocial Behavior and Social Status. In: Cheng J., Tracy J., Anderson C. (eds) The Psychology of Social Status. Springer, New York, NY. (2014). Prosocial Behavior and Social Status. In: Cheng J., Tracy J., Anderson C. (eds) The Psychology of Social Status. Springer, New York, NY.
Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(2), 279.
Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Dubois, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Power and morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 15-19.
Liu, Y., Chen, S., Bell, C., & Tan, J. (2019). How Do Power and Status Differ in Predicting Unethical Decisions? A Cross-National Comparison of China and Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16.
Lucas, B. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Is utilitarianism risky? How the same antecedents and mechanism produce both utilitarian and risky choices. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 541-548.
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086-4091.
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., & Horberg, E. (2016). Wealth and wrongdoing: Social class differences in ethical reasoning and behavior.
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2018). Unpacking the inequality paradox: The psychological roots of inequality and social class. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 53-124): Elsevier.
Redhead, D., Cheng, J. T., Driver, C., Foulsham, T., & O'Gorman, R. (2019). On the dynamics of social hierarchy: A longitudinal investigation of the rise and fall of prestige, dominance, and social rank in naturalistic task groups. Evol. Hum. Behav, 40, 222-234.
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352-368.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory.
Suessenbach, F., Loughnan, S., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Moore, A. B. (2019). The dominance, prestige, and leadership account of social power motives. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 7-33.
Trautmann, S. T., Van De Kuilen, G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2013). Social class and (un) ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 487-497.
Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of management review, 11(3), 601-617.
Winter, D. G., & Barenbaum, N. B. (1985). Responsibility and the power motive in women and men. Journal of Personality, 53(2), 335-355.