تأثیر تصویرسازی، مشاهده و اجرای الگو درون زمین بر عملکرد بازی‌های تنظیم‌شده بسکتبالیست‌های ماهر

نویسندگان
امیرمحمد بهروز عابدینی 1
مهدی شهبازی 1
الهه عرب عامری 1
مهران شاهین طبع 2
1 دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشگاه افسری امام علی (ع)
چکیده
اثربخشی روش‌­های مختلف آموزشی در یادگیری انواع مهارت­‌های حرکتی، مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. با این وجود، مقایسه این روش‌­ها در بازی­‌های تنظیم شده ورزش‌­های تیمی، کمتر مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. بنابراین هدف از مطالعه حاضر، مقایسه سه روش آموزشی تصویرسازی، مشاهده و اجرای الگو درون زمین بر عملکرد بازی­‌های تنظیم‌­شده در بسکتبالیست­‌های ماهر بود. بدین منظور 15 بازیکن شاغل در رقابت­‌های سوپرلیگ و لیگ برتر کشور به طور در دسترس در این تحقیق شرکت کردند. بازیکنان با توجه به پست بازی، به 3 تیم 5 نفره تقسیم شدند و براساس دسته­‌بندی تصادفی، در هر مرحله تحت یکی از سه شرایط تمرینی قرار گرفتند؛ به طوری که هر گروه هر سه روش را به طور تصادفی در هر مرحله انجام داد. هر کدام از شرایط، شامل 1 جلسه تمرین و جلسه آزمون کتبی و عملی (بعد از 24 ساعت) بود. بازیکنان در شرایط مشاهده، هر تاکتیک را 3 بار مشاهده کردند؛ در شرایط تصویرسازی نیز 3 کوشش تصویرسازی برای هر تاکتیک انجام شد و شرایط اجرا، شامل 3 اجرای آهسته تاکتیک­ها داخل زمین بود. نتایج تحلیل واریانس مرکب 3 (روش آموزش) در 2 (آزمون کتبی و عملی) نشان داد روش اجرا در مقایسه با مشاهده و تصویرسازی موجب عملکرد بهتر در بازی­های تنظیم‌­شده شد (001/0>P)؛ هم­چنین در آزمون کتبی، روش مشاهده نیز نسبت به روش تصویرسازی موجب امتیاز بیشتری شد (05/0>P). بنابراین به نظر می­رسد روش اجرای درون زمین برای آموزش تاکتیک­‌های تیمی در بازیکنان ماهر، مزیت بیشتری را نسبت به روش مشاهده و تصویرسازی ایجاد می­‌کند اما تصویرسازی ذهنی نیز، در کسب دانش تاکتیک­‌های تیمی مؤثرتر از مشاهده عمل می­‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها
تاکتیک
مهارت‌های باز‌
شبیه‌سازی حرکتی
الگودهی
بازی‌های تنظیم شده

عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Imagery, Observation and Execution of the Pattern in the Field on the Performance of the Regulated Games of Skilled Basketball Players

نویسندگان English

Amir Mohammad Behrouz Abedini 1
Mehdi Shahbazi 1
Elaheh ArabAmeri 1
Mehran Shahintab 2
1 University of Tehran
چکیده English

The effectiveness of different educational methods in learning different types of motor skills has been considered. However, comparisons of these methods in regulated team sports games have been less studied. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the three educational methods of imagery, observation, and execution of in-field pattern on the performance of regulated games in skilled basketball players.15 players working in the country's Super League and Premier League competitions participated in this study with available access. The players were divided into 3 teams of 5 players according to the position of the game and were subjected to one of three training conditions in each stage based on random classification; So that each team performed all three methods randomly in each stage. Each condition included 1 practice session and a written and practical test session (after 24 hours). The players observed each tactic 3 times in the observation conditions; In terms of imagery, 3 trials were made for each tactic, and the execution conditions included 3 slow execution of tactics inside the field. The results of mixed analysis of variance 3 (training method) in 2 (written and practical test) showed that the execution method compared to observation and imagery causes better performance in regulated games (P <0.05); Also in the written test, the observation method scored higher than the imagery (P <0.05). Therefore, it seems that the field execution method for teaching team tactics in skilled players, has a greater advantage than the observation and imagery method, but the mental imagery is also more effective in acquiring knowledge of team tactics than observation.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Tactic
Open skill
Motor stimulation Modelling
Regulated games
Abreu, A. M., Macaluso, E., Azevedo, R. T., Cesari, P., Urgesi, C., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012). Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35(10), 1646-1654. [DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08104.x]
Bennett, K. J. M., Novak, A. R., Pluss, M. A., Coutts, A. J., & Fransen, J. (2019). Assessing the validity of a video-based decision-making assessment for talent identification in youth soccer. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22(6), 729-734. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2018.12.011]
Davids, K., Araújo, D., Correia, V., & Vilar, L. (2013). How Small-Sided and Conditioned Games Enhance Acquisition of Movement and Decision-Making Skills. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 41(3). Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/acsm-essr/Fulltext/2013/07000/How_Small_Sided_and_Conditioned_Games_Enhance.4.aspx [DOI:10.1097/JES.0b013e318292f3ec]
Eaves, D. L., Riach, M., Holmes, P. S., & Wright, D. J. (2016). Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10(NOV), 1-10. [DOI:10.3389/fnins.2016.00514]
Fazeli, D., Rostami, R., & Nazemzadegan, G. (2021). The effect of imagary and action observation on mental representation and
accuracy of basketball free throw. Sport Psychology Studies, Pre Print.
Filimon, F., Nelson, J. D., Hagler, D. J., & Sereno, M. I. (2007). Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. NeuroImage, 37(4), 1315-1328. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.008]
Frank, C., Linstromberg, G. L., Hennig, L., Heinen, T., & Schack, T. (2018). Team action imagery and team cognition: Imagery of game situations and required team actions promotes a functional structure in players' representations of team-level tactics. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 40(1), 20-30. [DOI:10.1123/jsep.2017-0088]
Grosprêtre, S., Ruffino, C., & Lebon, F. (2016, April). Motor imagery and cortico-spinal excitability: A review. European Journal of Sport Science. Taylor and Francis Ltd. [DOI:10.1080/17461391.2015.1024756]
Guillot, A., Nadrowska, E., & Collet, C. (2009). Using Motor Imagery to Learn Tactical Movements in Basketball. Journal of Sport Behavior, 32(2), 189.
Hempy, Danyon. (2020). Examining the Effects of Observational Learning Versus Coaching/Feedback on a Basketball Free Throw Shot. Senior Independent Study
Theses.
Hempy, DMR. (2020). Examining the Effects of Observational Learning Versus Coaching/Feedback on a Basketball Free Throw Shot. Retrieved from https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/9170/
Iglesias, D., Moreno, M. P., Santos-Rosa, F. J., Cervelló, E. M., & Del Villar, F. (2005). Cognitive expertise in sport: Relationships between procedural knowledge, experience and performance in youth basketball. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 49(1), 065-076.
Imas, Y., Borysova, O., Dutchak, M., Shlonska, O., Kogut, I., & Marynych, V. (2018). Technical and tactical preparation of elite athletes in team sports (Volleyball). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(2), 972-979. [DOI:10.7752/jpes.2018.02144]
Ingram, T. G. J., Kraeutner, S. N., Solomon, J. P., Westwood, D. A., & Boe, S. G. (2016). Skill acquisition via motor imagery relies on both motor and perceptual learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 130(2), 252-260. [DOI:10.1037/bne0000126]
Kim, T., Frank, C., & Schack, T. (2017). A systematic investigation of the effect of action observation training and motor imagery training on the development of mental representation structure and skill performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(October), 1-13. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00499]
Lorey, B., Naumann, T., Pilgramm, S., Petermann, C., Bischoff, M., Zentgraf, K., … Munzert, J. (2013). How equivalent are
the action execution, imagery, and observation of intransitive movements? Revisiting the concept of somatotopy during action simulation. Brain and Cognition, 81(1), 139-150.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.011 [DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.011.]
Manuel Flores Araujo, R. (2012). Procedural Knowledge, Decision Making and Performance in Women's Volleyball According to Age Group and Specific Experience. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5(1), 167-173. [DOI:10.2174/1875399X01205010167]
McCullagh, P., & Weiss, M. R. (2001). Modeling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. Wiley. Retrieved from https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/modeling-considerations-for-motor-skill-performance-and-psycholog
Mizuguchi, N., & Kanosue, K. (2017). Changes in brain activity during action observation and motor imagery: Their relationship with motor learning. Progress in Brain Research (1st ed., Vol. 234). Elsevier B.V. [DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008]
Morris, T., Spittle, M., & Anthony, W. (2005). Imagery in Sport (1st ed.).
Naish, K. R., Houston-Price, C., Bremner, A. J., & Holmes, N. P. (2014, November 1). Effects of action observation on corticospinal excitability: Muscle specificity, direction, and timing of the mirror response. Neuropsychologia. Elsevier Ltd. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.034]
Robin, N., Toussaint, L., Joblet, E., Roublot, E., & Coudevylle, G. R. (2020). The beneficial influence of combining motor imagery and coach's feedback on soccer pass accuracy in intermediate players. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 8(2), 262-269.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2019-0024 [DOI:10.1123/JMLD.2019-0024]
Roosink, M., & Zijdewind, I. (2010). Corticospinal excitability during observation and imagery of simple and complex hand tasks: Implications for motor rehabilitation. Behavioural Brain Research, 213(1), 35-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.027]
Ruffino, C., Truong, C., Dupont, W., Bouguila, F., Michel, C., Lebon, F., & Papaxanthis, C. (2021). Acquisition and consolidation processes following motor imagery practice. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81994-y [DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-81994-y.]
Sethu, S. (2014). Effect of technique training with and without visual feedback on high jump performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Computational and Applied Sciences, 10(4), 314-318.
Sharma, N., Pomeroy, V. M., & Baron, J. C. (2006, July 1). Motor imagery: A backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc]
Sobierajewicz, J., Przekoracka-Krawczyk, A., Jaśkowski, W., Verwey, W. B., & van der Lubbe, R. (2017). The influence of motor imagery on the learning of a fine hand motor skill. Experimental Brain Research, 235(1), 305-320. [DOI:10.1007/s00221-016-4794-2]
Springer, A., Parkinson, J., & Prinz, W. (2013). Action simulation: Time course and representational mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(JUL), 1-20. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00387]
van Maarseveen, M. J. J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2018). In situ examination of decision-making skills and gaze behaviour of basketball players. Human Movement Science, 57, 205-216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.12.006 [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2017.12.006.]
Williams, J., Pearce, A. J., Loporto, M., Morris, T., & Holmes, P. S. (2012). The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability. Behavioural Brain Research, 226(2), 369-375. [DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.014]
Williams, M., Davids, K., Burwitz, L., & Williams, J. (1993). Cognitive Knowledge and Soccer Performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(2), 579-593. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.579]
Wright, D. J., McCormick, S. A., Williams, J., & Holmes, P. S. (2016). Viewing Instructions Accompanying Action Observation Modulate Corticospinal Excitability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(FEB2016), 17. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00017]
Wright, D. J., Williams, J., & Holmes, P. S. (2014). Combined action observation and imagery facilitates corticospinal excitability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(NOV), 951. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00951]