اثر بازنمایی شناختی اجتماعی بر مالکیت ذهنی بدن: شواهدی مبتنی بر خطای دست مصنوعی

نویسندگان
آزیتا خرامان
حسین زارع
سوسن علیزاده فرد
مجید صفاری نیا
دانشگاه پیام نور
چکیده
بازنمایی‌های ذهنی، از پیشرفته‌ترین جنبه‌های شناختی انسان هستند و علاوه بر بازنمایی‌های بدنی خود، بازنمایی‌های مربوط به شناخت اجتماعی از دیگران نیز می‌تواند بر تجربه ذهنی مالکیت هر فرد نسبت به بدنش مؤثر باشد. بر این اساس، پژوهش حاضر که یک مطالعه نیمه‌آزمایشی براساس اندازه‌گیری‌های مکرر است، با هدف بررسی اثر بازنمایی شناختی اجتماعی بر مالکیت ذهنی بدن انجام گرفت. جامعه شامل دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام‌نور تهران بود که از آن، 61 زن و 47 مرد به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل آزمایش خطای دست مصنوعی کوهن و بوتوینیک (1998)، و پرسشنامه گزارش ذهنی تجربه مالکیت دست مصنوعی لونگو و همکاران (2008) بود. القای بازنماییهای شناخت اجتماعی، بر اساس مدل ذهنی سه‌بعدی شناخت اجتماعی تامیر و تورنتون (2020) انجام می‌گرفت. داده‌های گردآوری شده از طریق تحلیل واریانس اندازه‌گیری‌های مکرر و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS-22، تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. طبق یافته‌ها، نمره خطای دست مصنوعی افراد نسبت به دست پلاستیکی با رنگ نزدیک به بدن و سبز، که به لحاظ فاکتور‌های سطوح مدل سه‌بعدی شناخت اجتماعی در سطح بالای افراطی‌ تعریف شده بود، بیشتر و نسبت به دست پلاستیکی آبی که در سطوح افراطی پایینی از مدل سه‌بعدی ذهنی قرار داشت، کمتر بود. نتایج بدست آمده حاکی از آن است که در مناسبات اجتماعی، همانند‌سازی افراد با کسانی که درارزیابی‌های ذهنی جایگاه اجتماعی بالاتری کسب کرده‌اند، می‌تواند بیشتر از کسانی باشد که در بازنمایی‌های ذهنی جایگاه اجتماعی پایین‌تری کسب کرده‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بازنمایی ذهنی
مالکیت ذهنی بدنی
شناخت اجتماعی
خطای دست مصنوعی

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of social cognitive representation on the mental property of the body: Evidence based on rubber hand illusion

نویسندگان English

Azita Kharaman
Hossein Zare
Soosan Alizadehfard
Majid Saffarinia
Payam Noor
چکیده English

Mental representations are to be considered as the most advanced aspects of human cognition and in addition to their own physical representations, representations of social cognition of others can also affect the mental experience of each person's ownership of their body. Accordingly, the present research as a quasi-experimental study based on repeated measures, was conducted in order to investigate the effect of social cognitive representation on the mental property of the body. The population of the study consisted of all Students of Payame Noor University of Tehran from which 61 females and 47 males were selected by convenience sampling. The research instruments included Cohen and Botvinick's (1998) Rubber Hand Illusion Test, and Longo, et al.'s (2008) Rubber Hand Ownership Experience Mental Report Questionnaire. Induction of representations of social cognition was based on the three-dimensional mental model of social cognition by Tamir and Thornton (2020). The collected data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance using SPSS-22 software. According to the findings, the error score of the rubber hand was higher than the rubber hand with the color close to the body and green, which was defined in terms of the factors of the levels of the three-dimensional model of social cognition at the extreme level, and lower than the blue rubber hand, which was at extremely low levels of the mental three-dimensional model. The results indicated that in social relations, the identification of individuals with those who have gained a higher social status in mental evaluations can be more than those who have gained a lower social status in mental representations.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Mental Representation
Body-Mental Ownership
Social-Cognition
rubber hand illusion
Alizadeh Fard, S., Kkharaman, A., & Zare, H. (2021). Investigating the Mediating Role of Embodied Self-Awareness in Predicting Rubber Hand Illusion based on Psychological Self-Awareness. Journal of Cognitive Psychology; 9(1): 55-70. [persian]
Allen, M., & Friston, K.J. (2016). From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese; 195(6): 2459–2482.
Baker, C.L., Jara-Ettinger, J., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2017). Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing. Nature Human Behavior; 1: 0064.
Brewer, R., Biotti, F., Catmur, C., Press, C., Happe, F., Cook, R., & Bird, G. (2016). Can neurotypical individuals read autistic facial expressions? Atypical production of emotional facial expressions in autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research; 9(2): 262–271.
Cascio, C.J., Foss-Feig, J.H., Burnette, C.P., Heacock, J.L., & Cosby, A.A. (2012). The rubber hand illusion in children with autism spectrum disorders: delayed influence of combined tactile and visual input on proprioception. Autism; 16: 406–419.
Convy, J.R., Coll, M. P., Cuve, H. C., Koletsi, S., Bronitt, N., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2020). Understanding How Minds Vary Relates to Skill in Inferring Mental States, Personality, and Intelligence. Experimental Psychology; 149(6): 1032-1047.
Conway, J.R., Catmur. C., & Bird, G. (2019). Understanding individual differences in theory of mind via representation of minds, not mental states. Psych on Bull Rev; 26(3): 798–812.
Ehrsson, H.H. (2012). The concept of body ownership and its relation to multisensory integration. In B. E. Stein (Ed.), the new handbook on multisensory processing (pp. 775–793). Cambridge, MA: Stein—The New Handbook of Multisensory Processes.
Eysenck, M.W., & Keane, M.T. (2010). Cognitive psychology of language and thinking. Translated by Hossein Zare and Mahdi Bagherpasandi. Tehran: Arjmand Publication, 2015. [persian]
Gallagher, S. (2000).Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends. Cogn. Sci; 4: 14–21.
Goodman, N.D., & Frank, M.C. (2016). Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences; 20(11): 818–829.
Greifeneder, R., & Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2018). Social Cognition: How Individuals Construct Social Reality. Translated by Susan AlizadehFard and Hossein Zare. Tehran: Arjmand Publication, 2019. [persian]
Groome, D., & Eysenck, M.W. (2016). An introduction to applied cognitive psychology. Translated by Hossein Zare and SeyedMorteza Nazari. Tehran: Arjmand Publication, 2019. [persian]
Heleven, E., & Overwalle, F.V. (2018). The Neural Basis of Representing Others' Inner States. Curr Opin Psychology; 23: 98-103.
Heyes, C.M., & Frith, C.D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science; 344(6190): 1243091.
Ide, M., Wada, M. (2017). Salivary Oxytocin Concentration Associates with the Subjective Feeling of Body Ownership during the Rubber Hand Illusion. Front Hum Neurosci; 11: 166.
Jara-Ettinger, J., Gweon, H., Schulz, L.E., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2016). The naïve utility calculus: computational principles underlying commonsense psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences; 20(8): 589–604.
Kiefer, M., & Pulvermuller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex; 48: 805–825.
Longo, M.R., Schuur, M., Kammers, P.M., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition; 107: 978–998.
Maister, L., Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition; 128(2)3: 170–178.
Makin, T.R., Holmes, N.P., Ehrsson, H.H. (2008). On the other hand: dummy hands and per personal space. Behavioral brain research; 191: 1–10.
Mortezazadeh, M., Rafezi, Z., & Eskandari, H. (2021). Comparison of the Effect of Experimental Induction of Social Exclusion with Social Acceptance on Cognitive Flexibility. Social Cognition; 10(1): 9-25. [persian]
Paton, B., Hohwy, J., & Enticott, P.G. (2012). The rubber hand illusion reveals proprioceptive and sensorimotor differences in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord; 42:1870–1883.
Pellicano, E., & Burr, D. (2012). When the world becomes “too real”: A Bayesian explanation of autistic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences; 16(10): 504–510.
Preißler, S., Dziobek, I., Ritter, K., Heekeren, H.R., & Roepke, S. (2010). Social cognition in borderline personality disorder: evidence for disturbed recognition of the emotions, thoughts, and intentions of others. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience; 4(December):1–8.
Reilly, M., & Desai, R.H. (2017). Effects of semantic neighborhood density in abstract and concrete words. Cognition; 169: 46–53.
Riečanský, I., Lengersdorff, L., Pfabigan, D.M. et al. (2020). Increasing self-other bodily overlap increases sensorimotor resonance to others’ pain. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience; 20: 19–33.
Russell, T.A., Schmidt, U., Doherty, L., Young, V., & Tchanturia, K. (2009). Aspects of social cognition in anorexia nervosa : Affective and cognitive theory of mind. Psychiatry Research. 168(3): 181–185.
Sasson, N.J., Faso, D.J., Nugent, J., Lovell, S., Kennedy, D.P., & Grossman, R.B. (2017). Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Scientific Reports; 7: 1–10.
Tavassoli, T., Miller, L.J., Schoen, S.A., Broute, J.J., Sullivan, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Sensory reactivity, empathizing and systemizing in autism spectrum conditions and sensory processing disorder. Dev Cogn Neurosci; 29: 72–7.
Thornton, M.A., & Tamir, D.I. (2020). People represent mental states in terms of rationality, social impact, and valence: Validating the 3d Mind Model. Cortex; 125: 44-59.
Tsakiris, M. (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia; 703-712.
Tsakiris, M. (2017). The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology; 70 (4): 597-609.
Tsakiris, M., Longo, M.R., & Haggard, P. (2010). Having a body versus moving your body :neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia; 48: 2740–2749.
Wada, M., Ide, M., Atsumi, T., Sano, Y., Shinoda, Y., Furuichi, T., & Kansaku, K. (2019). Rubber tail illusion is weakened in Ca2+-dependent activator protein for secretion 2 (Caps2)-knockout mice. Sci Rep; 9: 7552.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 9(4): 625–636.
Yaghobi, A., Mohammadi, S., ZofgiPaidar, M., & Farhadi, M. (2021). Develop a Structural Model to explain prosocial behaviors based on belonging motivation and sensitivity to rejection mediated by social trust. Social Cognition; 10(1): 26-43. [persian]