Examining the role of the three principles of personal contact, action, and double effect on moral decision making

Authors
Allameh Tabatabai University
Abstract
The three principles of double effect, personal contact, and action are suggested as the chief psychological mechanisms affecting human moral decision making in trolley dilemmas. The purpose of current research was to investigate the claim of the universality of these principles and their role in moral decision making in trolley dilemma in the oriental culture of Iran. In this research, using a semi-experimental single group pre-test-post-test design, four scenarios were used adopted from similar research. The statistical population of this research was the general population active in social media. The sample consisted of 235 participants with an average age of 30.34. Among the subjects, 143 were women and 92 were men. "McNemar" test was used for statistical analysis. Based on the results, the effect of all three principles on the ethical decision making of the subjects in trolley dilemma was confirmed significantly (Pvalue>0.05). Therefore, this research shows that all three principles of personal contact, action, and double effect are effectively influencing moral decision making.
Keywords

Abarbanell, L., Hauser, M. D. (2010, May). Mayan morality: An exploration of permissible harms. Cognition. 115(2):207-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.007.
Arutyunova, K. R.; Agarkov, V. A.; Alexandrov, Yu. I. (2016, January). Morality and religion: a study of moral judgments of orthodox Christians and nonbelievers in Russian culture. Experimental Psychology 9(1):21-37. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2016090103
Arutyunova Karina, R., Alexandrov Y. I., Hauser M. D. (2016, September). Sociocultural Influences on Moral Judgments: East–West, Male–Female, and Young–Old. Frontiers in Psychology. 7(e94842). P:1334. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01334
Arutyunova, K., & Hauser, M. (2013). Moral Judgments in Russian Culture: Universality and Cultural Specificity.Journal of cognition and culture, 13(3/4), 255-285.
Andrade, G. (2019, March). Medical ethics and the trolley problem. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 12, DOI:https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v12i3.766.
Atari, M., Graham, J., and Dehghani, M. (2019) Foundations of morality in Iran, Evolution and Human Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.014.
Banerjee, K., Huebner, B., & Hauser, M. (2010). Intuitive Moral Judgments are Robust across Variation in Gender, Education, Politics and Religion: A Large-Scale Web-Based Study, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3-4), 253-281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853710X531186
Christensen JF, Flexas A, Calabrese M, Gut NK, Gomila A. Moral judgment reloaded: a moral dilemma validation study. Front Psychol. 2014;5:607. Published 2014 Jul 1. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: Testing Three Principles of Harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x
Foot, P. (1967). The Problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review. 5: 5-15.
Thomson J.J. The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal. 1985; 94(6): 1395-415.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations. Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 5, 1029 –1046 DOI: 10.1037/a0015141
Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work?. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(12), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9
Hauser. M. , Cima. E., and Tonnaer. (2009). When Moral Intuitions Are Immune to the Law: A Case Study of Euthanasia and the Act-Omission Distinction in The Netherlands, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9(3-4), 149-169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156770909X12489459066147
Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Kang‐Xing Jin, R. and Mikhail, J. (2007), A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications. Mind & Language, 22: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x
Haidt, J., Joseph, C., (2004). Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 2004; 133 (4): 55–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555
Haidt, Jonathan & Joseph, Craig. (2008). The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules. The Innate Mind, Volume 3, Foundations and the Future. 3. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019.
Haidt J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science (New York, N.Y.), 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., Hauser, M. (2009, Jan). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends Cogn Sci. 13(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Dec 6. PMID: 19058993
O'Neill, P., & Petrinovich, L. (1998). A preliminary cross-cultural study of moral intuitions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(6), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00030-0
Petrinovich, L., O'Neill, P., & Jorgensen, M. (1993). An empirical study of moral intuitions: Toward an evolutionary ethics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.467
Petrinovich, L., O'Neill, P. (1996). Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(3), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6.
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science (New York, N.Y.), 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
Aghababai, Naser. Hatami, Javad. Examining the doctrine of double effect and the role of intention in moral judgment. Ethics and history of medicine: 2011, (4)3, 79-87. {in Persian}
Aghababai, Naser. Hatami, Javad. The role of the individual and the situation in moral judgment. Moral knowledge: 2012, (3)10, 73-88. {in Persian}
Azhdar, Alireza., Zamani, Mahdi., Alamolhoda, Seyed ali. And Panahi, Akbar. An analysis of critique of Kants Categorical imperative. Metaphysics (Journal of Isfahan Faculty of Literature and Humanities), 48(13), 79-94. {in Persian}
Coplestone, Frederick. Charles. (2013). A History of Philosophy. (Bahaaddin Khoramshahi, translator). (volume seven). Tehran: elmi va farhangi publishing company. (1985). {in Persian}
Coplestone, Freserick. Charles. (2014). A history of Philosophy. (Esmaiil Saadat and Manoochehr Bozorhmehr, translators). (volume eight). Tehran: elmi va farhangi publishing company. (1985). {in Persian}
Dabagh, Soroush. (2013). Lessons in the philosophy of ethics. Tehran: Farhangi Serat institute. {in Persian}
Driver, Julia. (2015). Consequentialism. (Shirzad Pik herfeh, translator). Tehran: Hekmat. (2012). {in Persian}
Edwards, Paul., Borchert, Donald. M. (2020). Encyclipedia of Philosophy. (Enshaallah Rahmati, translator). Tehran: Soofia. (2006). {in Persian}
Hauser, Marc. D. (2020). Moral Minds: The Nature of Right and Wrong. (Mohammad Farokhi yekta, translator). Tehran: Hermes. (2006). {in Persian}
Haidt, Jonathan. (2019). The Righteous Mind. (Amin Yazdani and Hadi Bahmani, translators). Tehran: Novin Tosee. {in Persian}
MacNiven, Don. (2016). Creative Morality. (Adib Frotan, translator). (first edition). Tehran: Ghoghnoos. (1993). {in Persian}
Movahedi, Mohammad Javad., Golzaresfahani, Mojgan. (2010). Evaluation of abortion based on double effect theory. Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History. 3(2), 36-44. {in Persian}
Nejat, P., Bagherian, F., Shokri, A., and Hatami, J. (2016). The model of relying on moral foundations in the mental representation of an Iranian example of an ideal society and moral and immoral behaviors. Cognitives science news, 18(3), 27-39. {in Persian}
Popkin, Richard., Stroll, Arrum. (2013). Generalities of Philosophy. (Jalaladdin Mojtabavi, translator). Tehran: Hekmat. {in Persian}
Rachels, James. (2018). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. (Arash Akhgari, translator). (2th edition). Tehran: hekmat. (1993). {in Persian}
Reber, Arthur. (2014). The Penguin Dictionary of psychology. (Yousef Karimi, Hamayak Avadisyans, Mohammad Ali Asghari Moghadam, Farzane Farahzad, Siamak Naghshbandi, Mohammad Reza Nikkho, Javad Tahoorian, and Zhasnet Salibi, translators). (2th edition). Tehran: Roshd. (1995). {in Persian}
Vali Asl, Alireza. Jahed, Mohsen. (2016). The principle of double effect and its applications in medical ethics. Bioethics. 6(19). 49-73. {in Persian}
Workman, Lance., Reader, Will. (2017). Evolutionary Psychology. (Arash Hoseynian, translator). (volume II). Mashhad: Talangor. (2014). {in Persian}
Mansourian H, Nesari A, Moradi A, Mohamadi B. (2018). Computational modeling of dynamic decision making using connectionist networks. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 6 (3) :11-20
URL: http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3033-fa.html. {in Persian}
Mirzaee T, Farahani M N, Hasani J. Explore the relationship between affection and Conscientious whit moral judgment. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2014; 2 (2) :27-36
URL: http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2231-fa.html. {in Persian}
Churchland, Patricin Smith. (2021). Braintrust: what neuroscience tells us about morality?. (masoomeh malekian, translator). Tehran: sailav. (2011).