پیش‌بینی مالکیت ذهنی بدن بر اساس بازنمایی‌های شناختی- اجتماعی: مبتنی بر مدل سه‌بعدی ذهنی تامیر و تورنتون

نویسندگان
آزیتا خرامان 1
حسین زارع 2
سوسن علیزاده فرد 2
مجید صفاری نیا 2
1 پیام‌نور تهران
2 مرکز تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه پیام نور تهران
چکیده
بازنمایی‌های ذهنی، از پیشرفته‌ترین جنبه‌های شناختی انسان هستند و می‌توانند بر تجربه ذهنی مالکیت هر فرد نسبت به بدنش مؤثر باشند. بر این اساس، مطالعه حاضر که یک پژوهش آمیخته دو مرحله ای است، پس از القای سه حالت از سطوح فاکتورهای شناختی- اجتماعی (همتراز با خود فرد، سطح بالاتر، سطح پایین تر)، به تبیین و پیش بینی مالکیت ذهنی بدن، پرداخته است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، شامل دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام‌نور تهران بود که از آن، 61 زن و 47 مرد به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل آزمایش خطای دست مصنوعی کوهن و بوتوینیک (1998)، پرسشنامه گزارش ذهنی تجربه مالکیت دست مصنوعی لونگو و همکاران (2008) و برنامه کامپیوتری 12 بلوکی مدل ذهنی سه بعدی تامیر و تورنتون برای تداعی ضمنی و آشکار بازنماییهای شناخت اجتماعی بود. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با آزمون همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد که فقط همبستگی نمرات خطای دست و مؤلفه‏های شناخت اجتماعی در سطح سوم (پایین تر)، معنادار بود. همچنین، تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه استاندارد نشان داد که در تبیین خطای دست در سطح سوم (پایین تر)، بر اساس تداعی آشکار؛ فقط انزجار (Beta= -1/52)، و براساس تداعی ضمنی؛ به ترتیب دوستی (Beta= 0/63)، انزجار (Beta= -0/55)، و رضایت (Beta= 0/26)، قادر به پیش‌بینی خطای دست مصنوعی بودند. نتایج بدست آمده حاکی از آن است که همانند‌سازی افراد با کسانی که در ارزیابی‌های ذهنی فرد جایگاه اجتماعی پایین تری کسب می کنند، می‌تواند کمتر رخ بدهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بازنمایی ذهنی
مالکیت ذهنی بدنی
عقلانیت
برداشت اجتماعی
شناخت اجتماعی
ارزش‌گذاری

عنوان مقاله English

Prediction of subjective body ownership based on social-cognitive representations: based on Tamir and Thornton's three-dimensional mental model

نویسندگان English

Azita Kharaman 1
Hossein Zare 2
Soosan Alizadeh Fard 2
Majid Saffarinia 2
1 Payam Noor
2 Payam Noor
چکیده English

Mental representations are one of the most advanced aspects of human cognition and can affect the mental experience of ownership of each person's body. Based on this, the present study, which is a two-stage mixed research, after inducing three levels of social-cognitive factors (equivalent to the individual, higher level, lower level), explained and predicted the mental ownership of the body. Is. The statistical population of the research included the students of Payam Noor University in Tehran, from which 61 women and 47 men were selected by convenience sampling. The research tools included the artificial hand error test of Cohen and Botvinik (1998), the subjective report questionnaire of the experience of owning an artificial hand by Longo et al. (2008) and the 12-block computer program of Tamir and Thornton's three-dimensional mental model for implicit and explicit association of social cognition representations. Data analysis with Pearson's correlation test showed that only the correlation of hand error scores and social cognition components at the third (lower) level was significant. Also, the standard multiple regression analysis showed that in explaining hand error at the third (lower) level, based on obvious association; Disgust only (Beta = -1.52), and based on implicit association; Friendship (Beta = 0.63), disgust (Beta = -0.55), and satisfaction (Beta = 0.26) were able to predict artificial hand error, respectively. The obtained results indicate that the identification of people with those who get a lower social status in the subjective evaluations of the person can occur less often.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Mental Representation
physical mental ownership
rationality
social perception
Social cognition
valuation
Greifeneder, R., & Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2018). Social Cognition: How Individuals Construct Social Reality. Translated by Susan AlizadehFard and Hossein Zare. Tehran: Arjmand Publication, 2019. [persian]
Groome, D., & Eysenck, M.W. (2016). An introduction to applied cognitive psychology. Translated by Hossein Zare and SeyedMorteza Nazari. Tehran: Arjmand Publication, 2019. [persian]
Hassabis D, Spreng R N, Rusu A A, Robbins C A, Mar R A, & Schacter D L. (2014).Imagine all the people: How the brain creates and uses personality models to predict behavior. Cerebral Cortex, 24(8), 1979–1987. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht042
Heleven, E., & Overwalle, F.V. (2018). The Neural Basis of Representing Others' Inner States. Curr Opin Psychology; 23: 98-103.
Henderson M D, Wakslak C J, Fujita K, Rohrbach J. (2011).Construal level theory and spatial distance implications for mental representation, judgment, and behavior. Soc. Psychol. 42 165–173.doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000060
Huynh D V,Bekrater-Bodmann R, Fröhner J, Vogt J,Beckerle P.(2019).Robotic hand illusion with tactile feedback: Unravelling the relative contribution of visuotactile and visuomotor input to the representation of body parts in space. PLoS One.14(1): e0210058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210058
Ide, M., Wada, M. (2017). Salivary Oxytocin Concentration Associates with the Subjective Feeling of Body Ownership during the Rubber Hand Illusion. Front Hum Neurosci; 11: 166.
Inzlicht M, Gutsell JN, Legault L.)2012).Mimicry reduces racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48:361–365. doi:org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.007
Jara-Ettinger, J., Gweon, H., Schulz, L.E., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2016). The naïve utility calculus: computational principles underlying commonsense psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences; 20(8): 589–604.
Jern A, & Kemp C .(2015).A decision network account of reasoning about other people’s choices. Cognition, 142, 12–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.006
Kalckert A.(2018). Commentary: Switching to the Rubber Hand. Front Psychol.9: 588. Published online 2018 May 2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00588
Koster-Hale J, Richardson H, Velez N, Asaba M, Young L, & Saxe R. (2017) Mentalizing regions represent distributed, continuous, and abstract dimensions of others’ beliefs. Neuroimage, 161, 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage
Lloyd D M.(2007).Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain Cogn.64:104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.013
Longo, M.R., Schuur, M., Kammers, P.M., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition; 107: 978–998.
Maister L, Tsiakkas E, & Tsakiris M. (2013).I feel your fear: Shared touch between faces facilitates recognition of fearful facial expressions. Emotion, 13(1), 7–13. doi: 10.1037/a0030884. Epub 2013 Jan 28
Maister, L., Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition; 128(2)3: 170–178.
Ocklenburg S, Ruther N, Peterburs J, Pinnow M, & Gunturkun O. (2011).Laterality in the rubber hand illusion. Laterality, 16(2), 174–187. doi.org/10.1080/13576500903483515
Paton, B., Hohwy, J., & Enticott, P.G. (2012). The rubber hand illusion reveals proprioceptive and sensorimotor differences in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord; 42:1870–1883.
Pellicano, E., & Burr, D. (2012). When the world becomes “too real”: A Bayesian explanation of autistic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences; 16(10): 504–510.
Preibler, S., Dziobek, I., Ritter, K., Heekeren, H.R., & Roepke, S. (2010). Social cognition in borderline personality disorder: evidence for disturbed recognition of the emotions, thoughts, and intentions of others. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience; 4(December):1–8.
Russell, T.A., Schmidt, U., Doherty, L., Young, V., & Tchanturia, K. (2009). Aspects of social cognition in anorexia nervosa : Affective and cognitive theory of mind. Psychiatry Research. 168(3): 181–185.
Sasson, N.J., Faso, D.J., Nugent, J., Lovell, S., Kennedy, D.P., & Grossman, R.B. (2017). Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Scientific Reports; 7: 1–10.
Tajadura-Jiménez A, Tsakiris A.( 2014).Balancing the “inner”and the “outer” self: interoceptive sensitivity modulates self-other boundaries. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.143 (2), 736–744. doi: 10.1037/a0033171
Tamir DI, Thornton MA, Contreras JM, Mitchell JP.(2016).Neural evidence that three dimensions organize mental state representation: Rationality, social impact, and valence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(1):194–199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511905112
Tamir DI, Thornton MA.(2018).Modeling the predictive social mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 22(3):201–212. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.12.005
Tavassoli, T., Miller, L.J., Schoen, S.A., Broute, J.J., Sullivan, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2018). Sensory reactivity, empathizing and systemizing in autism spectrum conditions and sensory processing disorder. Dev Cogn Neurosci; 29: 72–7.
Thornton M A, Weaverdyck M E, & Tamir D I. (2019).The social brain automatically predicts others' future mental states. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(1), 140e148. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1431-18.2018
Thornton, M.A., & Tamir, D.I. (2020). People represent mental states in terms of rationality, social impact, and valence: Validating the 3d Mind Model. Cortex; 125: 44-59.
Tsakiris, M. (2017). The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology; 70 (4): 597-609.
Wada, M., Ide, M., Atsumi, T., Sano, Y., Shinoda, Y., Furuichi, T., & Kansaku, K. (2019). Rubber tail illusion is weakened in Ca2+-dependent activator protein for secretion 2 (Caps2)-knockout mice. Sci Rep; 9: 7552.
Wigham S, Rodgers J, South M, McConachie H, Freeston H.(2015).The interplay between sensory processing abnormalities, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety and restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 45:943–52. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2248-x
Williams L E, Bargh J A. (2008).Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth lawrence. Science 322 606–607.doi: 10.1126/science.1162548
Yeh S L, Lane T J ,Chang A Y ,Chien S E.(2017).Switching to the Rubber Hand. Front Psychol. 8: 2172. Published online 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02172