بررسی تأثیر محدودیت شناختی بر روی قضاوت از اطمینان نهایی در انتهای فرآیند حل مسئله

نویسندگان
1 پژوهشکده علوم شناختی
2 دانشگاه اوربرو
چکیده
مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی تأثیر محدودیت ظرفیت حافظه کاری و بار شناختی اضافی بر قضاوت از اطمینان نهایی افراد پس از اتمام فرآیند حل مسئله برج هانوی انجام شد. به این منظور، دو گروه با اختلاف بار شناختی برای مطالعه تشکیل شدند و دانشجویان ایرانی در بازه سنی 20 تا 40 سال از دانشگاه‌های استان تهران وارد این مطالعه شدند. پس از ارزیابی ظرفیت حافظه کاری، افراد در هر دو گروه نسخه رایانه‌ای مسئله برج هانوی را حل کردند و از طریق پرسشنامه ای که برای این مطالعه طراحی و ساخته شده بود، اطمینان از عملکرد خود را گزارش کردند. این مطالعه در سال 1399 آغاز شد و اجرای آن یک سال و نیم به طول انجامید. تحلیل واریانس دوطرفه و آزمون‌های فرض نشان دادند که اختلاف ظرفیت حافظه کاری دیداری و فضایی به تنهایی یا در تعامل با بار شناختی بر قضاوت از اطمینان نهایی افراد تأثیری ندارد، اما ارتباط دوطرفه میان تحمل بار شناختی اضافی و افزایش اطمینان نهایی وجود دارد. بدین ترتیب این مطالعه نشان داد، افرادی که بارشناختی بیشتری را تحمل می‌کنند، نسبت به عملکرد شناختی خود در انتهای فرآیند حل مسئله برج هانوی، اطمینان بیشتری دارند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the effect of cognitive limitations on the final judgment of confidence at the end of problem-solving process

نویسندگان English

faezeh akbarifeizabadi 1
reza kormi nouri 2
1 ICSS
2 Örebro University
چکیده English

This paper aims to investigate the impact of working memory capacity and excessive cognitive load on people's confidence after solving the Tower of Hanoi puzzle. For this purpose, two groups with different levels of cognitive load were formed for the study, and Iranian students in the age range of 20 to 40 years from universities in Tehran province were included in this study. After assessing working memory capacity, subjects in both groups solved the computerized version of the Tower of Hanoi problem. At the end, through a questionnaire that was designed and made for this study, they evaluated their confidence in their performance. This study started in 2019 and ended after one and a half years. However, the study did not find any relationship between the capacity of their visual-spatial working memory and their self-confidence, either alone or in interaction with the cognitive load, but there is a two-way relationship between bearing additional cognitive load and increasing final confidence. Therefore, people who bear more cognitive load are more confident about their cognitive performance at the end of the Tower of Hanoi problem-solving process.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Final judgement of confidence
working memory
Cognitive Load
Metacognition
Ackerman, R. & Thompson, V. A. (2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21(8), 607-617.
Ahadi, F. & Soleimani, M. (2014). Comparing the effect of two teaching methods by presenting a completely solved educational example. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 14(4), 291-302.
Akturk, A. O. & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3731-3736.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, Models and controversies. Annual review of psychology, 63.
Bago, B. & De Neys, W. (2020). Advancing the specification of dual process models of higher cognition: A critical test of the hybrid model view. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 1-30.‌
Barrett, L. F. Tugade, M. M. & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological bulletin, 130(4), 553.‌
Barrouillet, P. Lépine, R. & Camos, V. (2008). Is the influence of working memory capacity on high-level cognition mediated by complexity or resource-dependent elementary processes? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 528-534.
Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59.
Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of consciousness studies, 2(3), 200-219
Claessen, M. H., Van Der Ham, I. J., & Van Zandvoort, M. J. (2015). Computerization of the standard Corsi block-tapping task affects its underlying cognitive concepts: a pilot study. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 22(3), 180-188.Clark, M. S. Milberg, S. & Erber, R. (1984). Effects of arousal on judgments of others' emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 551.‌
Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework New York: Oxford University Press.
De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological science, 17(5), 428-433.
Evans, J. S. B. & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on psychological science, 8(3), 223-241.‌
Evans, J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(10), 454-459.
Feeney, A. & Thompson, V. A. (Eds.). (2015). Reasoning as memory. Psychology Press.‌
Folwarczny, M., Kaczmarek, M. C., Doliński, D. & Szczepanowski, R. (2018). Emotional see-saw affects rationality of decision-making: Evidence for metacognitive impairments. Acta psychologica, 186, 126-132.
Grimaldi, P. Lau, H. & Basso, M. A. (2015). There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 88-97.‌
Gwizdka, J. (2010, August). Using stroop task to assess cognitive load. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 219-222).‌
Hambrick, D. Z. & Engle, R. W. (2003). The role of working memory in problem solving. The psychology of problem solving, 176-206.‌
Humes, G. E., Welsh, M. C., Retzlaff, P., & Cookson, N. (1997). Towers of Hanoi and London: Reliability and Validity of Two Executive Function Tasks. Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 4(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119700400305
Jaeger, A. J. Shipley, T. F. & Reynolds, S. J. (2017). The roles of working memory and cognitive load in geoscience learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 506-518.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American psychologist, 58(9), 697.‌
Kemps, E. (2001). Complexity effects in visuo-spatial working memory: Implications for the role of long-term memory. Memory, 9(1), 13-27.‌
Khodadadi, M. & Amani, H. (2018). Corsi spatial-visual working memory test [Software]. Institute for behavioral and cognitive sciences, Tehran, Iran. https://www.sinapsycho.com/Shop/Product/1319
Kirschner, F. Paas, F. & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational psychology review, 21(1), 31-42.‌
Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A literature review. Always learning: Pearson research report, 24.
Larner, A. J. (2021). Functional Cognitive Disorders (FCD): How Is Metacognition Involved? Brain Sciences, 11(8), 1082.‌
Leòn-Carriòn, J., Morales, M., Forastero, P., Del, M., Domìnguez-Morales, R., Murillo, F., ... & Gordon, P. (1991). The computerized Tower of Hanoi: A new form of administration and suggestions for interpretation. Perceptual and motor skills, 73(1), 63-66.‌
Manstead, A. S. R. Wagner, H. L. & MacDonald, C. J. (1983). A contrast effect in judgments of own emotional state. Motivation and Emotion, 7(3), 279-290.‌
Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.). (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. MIT press.‌
Miyake, A. Friedman, N. P. Rettinger, D. A. Shah, P. & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 130(4), 621.
Muncer, G. Higham, P. Gosling, C. Cortese, S. Wood-Downie, H. & Hadwin, J. A. (2021). A Meta-Analysis Investigating the Association Between Metacognition and Math Performance in Adolescence. Educational Psychology Review.
Nazari, M.A.& Nabizadeh Chianeh, Q. (2012). Checking the validity and reliability of Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) Scale. Journal of Research in Psychological Health, 6(2).
Nelson, T. O. & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 429.
Paas, F. Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.‌
Pouget, A., Drugowitsch, J. & Kepecs, A. (2016). Confidence and Certainty: Distinct Probabilistic Quantities for Different Goals. Nature Neuroscience, 19(3), 366.‌
Rezapour, T., Ekhtiyari, H. & Soltaninejad, Z. (2013). procedure and scoring of Persian paper and pencil cognitive assessment package (PCAP). MEHRSA publication.
Ruiz, D. & Newell, A. (1989). Tower-noticing triggers strategy-change in the Tower of Hanoi: A Soar model. Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Dept Of Psychology.‌
Saed, O., Rushan, R., & Moradi, A. R. (2008). Investigating psychometric properties of Wechsler Memory Scale-for the students of Tehran Universities. Clinical psychology and personality, 6(2),57-70.
‌Sliwinski, M. J. Mogle, J. A. Hyun, J. Munoz, E. Smyth, J. M. & Lipton, R. B. (2018). Reliability and validity of ambulatory cognitive assessments. Assessment, 25(1), 14-30.
Sodian, B. Thoermer, C. Kristen, S. & Perst, H. (2012). Metacognition in infants and young children. Foundations of metacognition, 119-133.
Souza, A. S. & Oberauer, K. (2015). Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 156-162.‌
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Psychology Press.‌
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-8
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press
Sweller, J. (2018). Measuring cognitive load. Perspectives on medical education, 7(1), 1-2.
Turnbull, O. H. Denis, M. Mellet, E. Ghaëm, O. & Carey, D. P. (2012). The processing of visuo-spatial information: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging investigations. In Imagery, Language and Visuo-Spatial Thinking (pp. 97-124). Psychology Press.‌
Van Rooij, M. M. & Favela, L. H. (2016). A nonlinear dynamical systems theory perspective on dual-processing accounts of decision-making under uncertainty.‌
Wiley, J. & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 56, pp. 185-227). Academic Press.‌
Williams, M. & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1206.‌