Presenting a causal model of perception of e-learning (virtual) environment and reflective thinking with regard to the mediating role of cognitive flexibility among students of Payame Noor University of Shiraz

Authors
payamnoor
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relationship between the presentation of the causal model of perception of the electronic (virtual) learning environment and reflective thinking with regard to the mediating role of cognitive flexibility among the students of Payam Noor University in Shiraz. This research is descriptive and correlational. For this purpose, using simple random sampling, 400 students were selected as a statistical sample from all the students of Payam Noor University, Shiraz center, and questionnaires of perceptions from the educational environment of Sweeney et al. (1994), reflective thinking by Kamber et al. Cognitive flexibility questionnaire (CFI) was completed by Dennis and Vanderwaal (2010). All questionnaires are standard and have validity and reliability (alpha higher than 0.70). The collected data were analyzed with the help of Lisrel software. The results of the research showed that the direct and positive effect of engagement in academic assignments, learning authenticity and feeling of membership on the components of cognitive flexibility (perception of controllability, perception of behavior justification and perception of different options) is significant. Also, the direct and positive effect of the feeling of support on the components of the perception of controllability and the perception of different options is significant. In addition, the direct and positive effect of the sense of ownership on the component of the perception of the justification of behavior is significant. The direct and positive effect of flexibility components on reflective thinking is also significant. Also, the results showed that, in general, the mediating role of cognitive flexibility components is significant in the relationship between the perception of the educational environment and students' reflective thinking.
Keywords

Burton, N. W., Pakenham, K. I., & Brown, W. J. (2010). Feasibility and effectiveness of psychosocial resilience training: A pilot study of the READY program. Psychology Health & Medicine, 15 (3),266-277
https://doi.org/10.1080/13548501003758710
Chen F-H. (2021). Sustainable Education through E-Learning: The Case Study of iLearn2.0. Sustainability, 13(18):10186.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810186
Cragg L, Chevalier N. (2012). The processes underlying flexibility in childhood. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 65(2):209-232.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903204618
Dajani DR, Uddin LQ. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends in neurosciences, 38(9):571-578.
https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tins.2015.07.003
Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument Development and Estimates of Reliability and Validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241-253.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
Dong, G., Lin, X., Zhou, H., & Lu, Q. (2014).Cognitive flexibility in internet addicts: fMRI evidence from difficult-to-easy and easy-to-difficult switching situation. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 677–683
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.028
Dorman, J. P., Fisher, D.L., & Waldrip, B.G. (2006). Learning environments, attitudes, efficacy and perceptions of assessment: A LISREL analysis. In D.L. Fisher, & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments (pp.1-28). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/learning-environments-students-perceptions-of-assessment-academic
Ersözlü, Zehra N. & Mehmet Arslan. (2009). The effect of developing reflective thinking on metacognition awareness at primary education level in Turkey, Reflective Practice, 10:5, 683-695
DOI:10.1080/14623940903290752
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity, and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1: 7-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009932514731
Ghiyasabadi Farahani, Elham; Jafari Harandi, Reza. (2019). Prediction of cognitive flexibility based on social adaptation and responsibility of female students. Social Psychology Research, 10(40), 135-150.
https://doi.org/10.22034/spr.2021.127718
Hasan Nia, Somayeh; Fouladchang, Mahbubeh. (2015). Mindfulness in The relationship between perception of learning environment and academic burnout: structural Equation modeling. Evolutionary Psychology (Iranian Psychologists): 12(45): 61-73.(persian)
https://jip.stb.iau.ir/article_515876_af14ade20ada46ba699cbb84fad10b72.pdf
Haqprast, Shahrazad. (2014). Investigating the relationship between critical education and reflective thinking with the educational success of English language teachers. Master's thesis, Shahrekord University, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. (persian)
https://elmnet.ir/article/10895261-15102
Hong, Y. C., & Choi, I. (2011). Three Dimensions of Reflective Thinking in Solving Design Problems: A Conceptual Model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 687–710.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9202-9
Jacques, S., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). On the possible roots of cognitive flexibility. In B. D. Homer & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), the development of social cognition and communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313138426_On_the_possible_roots_of_cognitive_flexibility
Karwowski W. (2006). International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors-3 Volume Set: CRC Press.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482298536
Matthew Lynch; Uladzimir Kamovich; Kjersti K. Longva; Martin Steinert. (2021). Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students' reflections on the learning process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164: 119689
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.015
Moghdisi, Hamid; Rabiei, Reza; Bigdali Sholah, Nazimi Islam, Ebrahim Porsadeghiani Hassan. (2015). The role of models, approaches and learning theories in the design and production of educational software based on virtual reality techniques and simulation in nursing education: a systematic review. Journal of nursing and midwifery. 14 (4): 312-300.(persian)
http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-2825-fa.html
Mohammadi, Sudabah and Soroush, Fariborz. (2015). Examining the role of cognitive flexibility theory in teaching and learning, International Conference on Behavioral Sciences and Social Studies, Tehran. (persian)
https://civilica.com/doc/421061
Newmann, F. M. (Ed.). (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. NewYork: Teachers College Press
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED371047
Nor Aniza Ahmad and Lay Nee Chua. (2015). Technology and Higher Education: Using an E-Learning Tutorial as Pedagogy for Innovation and Flexible Learning. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education 17(1), 21–31.
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/46501
Rezayi, Mohsen; Alizadeh, Nadi;Paydar, Faranak (2021). The effect of computer educational games on mental flexibility and academic achievement in secondary school students in Chamestan city. Cultural Management, 15(52): 81-105. (persian)
https://jcm.srbiau.ac.ir/article_18423.html
Savinainen, A., & Scott, p. (2002). The Force Concept Inventory: A Tool for Monitoring Student Learning. Journal of Physics Education, 37(1): 45-52.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/37/1/306
Şenol Orakc. (2021). Exploring the relationships between cognitive flexibility, learner autonomy, and reflective thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41: 1008-1038.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100838
Sharifi P, Mousavi S A, Hasani J. The Discriminational Role of Reinforcement sensitivity theory, Emotion Regulation Processes Strategies and Cognitive Flexibility in Discrimination of People with Internet Addiction. Journal title 2018; 6 (2) :51-60. (persian)
http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23455780.1397.6.2.7.0
Sultana, F., Lim, C.P. & Liang, M. (2020). E-portfolios and the development of students’ reflective thinking at a Hong Kong University. J. Comput. Educ. 7, 277–294
DOI:10.1007/s40692-020-00157-6
Svetlana N. Kurbakova. Zlata N. Volkova, Alexander V. Kurbakov. (2021). Developing Students’ Cognitive Abilities in E-Learning Environment. 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning January 2021 Pages 124–130
https://doi.org/10.1145/3450148.3450180
Teekman, B. (2000). Exploring reflective thinking in nursing practice. Journal of
advanced nursing, 31(5), 1125-1135
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01424.x
Taghizadeh M E, Farmani A. A Study of the Role of Cognitive Flexibility in Predicting Hopelessness and Resilience among University Students. Journal title 2014; 1 (2) :67-75. (persian)
http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23455780.1392.1.2.7.5
Togari, T., Sato, M., Yamazaki, Y., & Otemori, R. (2011).The Development of Japanese 13-item Version of Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale for Japanese Urban High School Students. Journal of School Health, 7, 62-72.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13063
Yamini, Mohammad; Kadivar, Parvin; Farzad, Valiollah Moradi, Alireza. (1387). The relationship between perception of social constructive learning environment and thinking styles with a deep approach to learning and learning out comes. New Psychological Research (Tabriz University Psychology), 3(12): 139-171. (persian)
https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4327_53248aba7e55ba292f39c58e2c3a5e8b.pdf
Yilmaz, Fatma Gizem Karaoglan; Keser, Hafize. (2016). The impact of reflective thinking activities in e-learning: A critical review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, ISSN: 0360-1315, Vol: 95, Page: 163-173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.006
Zegeibi Ghannad, Simin; Baranian, Sahar; Alipur, Siros. (2019). On the relationship between perceptions of classroom quality and cognitive flexibility with academic challenge and academic performance among high school students. School Psychology, 8(4), 112-130. (persian)
Doi: 10.22098/jsp.2020.868
Zyngier, D. (2008). (Re) conceptualizing student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 24: 1765–1776.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004