تحلیل مدل ساختاری نقش تئوری ذهن و حافظه فعال در پیش‌بینی جهت‌گیری اهداف پیشرفت نوجوانان: رویکردی مبتنی بر کارکردهای شناختی–اجتماعی

نویسندگان
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر، تحلیل مدل ساختاری جهت‌گیری اهداف پیشرفت در نوجوانان بر اساس تئوری ذهن و حافظه فعال، در چارچوب کارکردهای شناختیاجتماعی بود. در این راستا، با بهره‌گیری از روش مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) و با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS 26 و AMOS 24، روابط مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بین تئوری ذهن، حافظه فعال و مؤلفه‌های چهارگانه جهت‌گیری هدف پیشرفت (تسلط‌گرایشی، تسلط‌اجتنابی، عملکردگرایشی، عملکرداجتنابی) بررسی شد. روش پژوهش توصیفیهمبستگی و جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانش‌آموزان دوره دوم متوسطه در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۳۱۴۰۴ بود. نمونه‌ای به حجم ۳۱۵ نفر به شیوه در دسترس انتخاب و از پرسش‌نامه‌های جهت‌گیری هدف پیشرفت الیوت و مک‌گریگور (۲۰۰۱)، آزمون خواندن ذهن در چشم‌ها بارون-کوهن (۲۰۰۱) و آزمون حافظه فعال خواندن-گستره دانیمن و کارپنتر (۱۹۸۰) برای گردآوری داده‌ها استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که تئوری ذهن به‌صورت مستقیم و همچنین به‌صورت غیرمستقیم از طریق حافظه فعال، پیش‌بینی‌کننده معنادار جهت‌گیری اهداف پیشرفت است. همچنین رابطه مثبت و معناداری میان تئوری ذهن و حافظه فعال مشاهده شد. شاخص‌های برازش مدل ( χ²/df = 2.31، GFI = 0.94، CFI = 0.96، RMSEA = 0.06 ) حاکی از برازش مطلوب مدل بود. به‌طور کلی، نتایج پژوهش بر نقش کلیدی فرایندهای شناختیاجتماعی (تئوری ذهن) و اجرایی (حافظه فعال) در شکل‌گیری جهت‌گیری‌های انگیزشی نوجوانان تأکید دارد و پیشنهاد می‌کند که مداخلات آموزشی همزمان بر تقویت تئوری ذهن و حافظه فعال می‌تواند به بهبود کیفیت انگیزش تحصیلی و جهت‌گیری‌های تسلط‌محور منجر شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Structural Model Analysis of the Role of Theory of Mind and Working Memory in Predicting Adolescents’ Achievement Goal Orientation: A Cognitive-Social Approach

نویسندگان English

Adnan Vaezi
Hossein Bigdeli
Mohsen Ahmadi Tahor Soltani
چکیده English

The present study aimed to examine the structural model of adolescents’ achievement goal orientation based on theory of mind and working memory within a cognitive-social framework. Using structural equation modeling (SEM) conducted in SPSS 26 and AMOS 24, direct and indirect relationships between theory of mind, working memory (as a mediator), and the four components of achievement goal orientation (mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance) were investigated. In this descriptive-correlational study, 315 high school students were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Achievement Goal Questionnaire (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001), and the Reading Span Task (Daneman & Carpenter, 1980). Results indicated that theory of mind significantly predicted all four achievement goal orientations both directly and indirectly through working memory. A significant positive relationship was also found between theory of mind and working memory. Fit indices (χ²/df = 2.31, GFI = 0.94, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06) confirmed the good fit of the proposed model. Overall, the findings highlight the critical role of socio-cognitive (theory of mind) and executive (working memory) processes in shaping adolescents’ motivational orientations and suggest that simultaneous interventions targeting both constructs may effectively promote adaptive (mastery-oriented) achievement goals and enhance academic motivation.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

theory of mind
working memory
achievement goals
Academic motivation
Socio-Cognitive Functions
Babaei, F., Abdollahi, M., Amini Gilvani, M., & Masoomifard, M. (2024). The mediating role of theory of mind in the relationship between executive functions and marital burnout using Structural Equation Modeling and Artificial Neural Networks (SEM-ANN). International Journal of Education and Cognitive Sciences, 5(4), 62-73.
Bajestani, G. S., Ghanizadeh, A., Makhloughi, F., Hosseinpour Kharrazi, F., Hosseini, A., & Toosi, M. B. (2024). The impact of blended mindfulness intervention (BMI) on university students’ sustained attention, working memory, academic achievement, and electroencephalogram (EEG) asymmetry. Mindfulness, 15(3), 675-688.
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high‐functioning autism. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 42(2), 241-251.
Buttazzoni, A., Dean, J., & Minaker, L. (2022). Urban design and adolescent mental health: A qualitative examination of adolescent emotional responses to pedestrian-and transit-oriented design and cognitive architecture concepts. Health & place, 76, 102825.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 19(4), 450-466.
Derakhshan, A. (2025). EFL students’ perceptions about the role of generative artificial intelligence (GAI)-mediated instruction in their emotional engagement and goal orientation: A motivational climate theory (MCT) perspective in focus. Learning and Motivation, 90, 102114.
Dicataldo, R., Roch, M., Di Maria, E., Granata, P., & Leo, I. (2025). Emotion comprehension in pre-schoolers: the role of verbal working memory, linguistic skills, and theory of mind. Early Child Development and Care, 1-15.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(3), 501.
Frumos, F. V., Leonte, R., Candel, O. S., Ciochină-Carasevici, L., Ghiaţău, R., & Onu, C. (2024). The relationship between university students’ goal orientation and academic achievement. The mediating role of motivational components and the moderating role of achievement emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1296346.
Giota, J., & Bergh, D. (2021). Adolescent academic, social and future achievement goal orientations: Implications for achievement by gender and parental education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 831-850.
Hassan, H., Hallez, H., Thielemans, W., & Vandeginste, V. (2024). A review of electro-active shape memory polymer composites: Materials engineering strategies for shape memory enhancement. European Polymer Journal, 208, 112861.
Heintalu, K., Saks, K., Edisherashvili, N., & Dekker, I. (2025). The conceptualisation of goal setting and goal orientation in higher education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 100709.
Imanipour, S., Sheikh, M., Shayestefar, M., & Baloochnejad, T. (2021). Deficits in working memory and theory of mind may underlie difficulties in social perception of children with ADHD. Neurology research international, 2021(1), 3793750.
Lebrault, H., Martini, R., Manolov, R., Chavanne, C., Krasny‐Pacini, A., & Chevignard, M. (2024). Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance to improve occupational performance goals for children with executive function deficits after acquired brain injury. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 66(4), 501-513.
Lecce, S., Ronchi, L., & Devine, R. T. (2024). The effect of peers’ theory of mind on children’s own theory of mind development: A longitudinal study in middle childhood and early adolescence. Developmental psychology, 60(7), 1269.
Li, S., Wang, Z., & Sun, Y. (2024). Relationship between thinking dispositions, working memory, and critical thinking ability in adolescents: A longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 12(6), 52.
Li, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, X., & Guo, D. (2024). Processing facial emojis as social information: Evidence from visual working memory for facial emojis, simple shapes, human faces, and their relations to theory of mind. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 108106.
Meneghetti, C., Labate, E., Toffalini, E., & Pazzaglia, F. (2021). Successful navigation: The influence of task goals and working memory. Psychological Research, 85(2), 634-648.  
Qiu, X., Gao, M., Zhu, H., Li, W., & Jiang, R. (2024). Theory of mind, empathy, and prosocial behavior in children and adolescent: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 43(22), 19690-19707.
Ramezani, M., Behzadipour, S., Pourghayoomi, E., Joghataei, M. T., Shirazi, E., & Fawcett, A. J. (2021). Evaluating a new verbal working memory-balance program: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial study on Iranian children with dyslexia. BMC neuroscience, 22(1), 55.
Sheykholeslami, A., Bakhshayesh, A., Barzegar-Bafrooei, K., & Moradi Ajami, V. (2017). The effectiveness of working memory training on reading performance and memory capacity of students with reading disability. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 47-58.
Shirovi, E., Mottaghi, S., & Mohammadpanah Ardakan, A. (2024). The Relationship of Theory of Mind with Working Memory and Problem Solving In Students: The Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 117-136.
Shirovi, E., Mottaghi, S., & Mohammadpanah Ardakan, A. (2024). The Relationship of Theory of Mind with Working Memory and Problem Solving In Students: The Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 117-136.
Shojaeian, N. (2019). Theory of mind in down syndrome and autism spectrum disorder: A study in Iran and Sweden.
Sosnowski, M. J., & Brosnan, S. F. (2025). Familiarity, active memory and pressure during a delayed matching-to-sample task in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] Apella). Animal Behavior and Cognition, 12(1), 32-44.
Talepasand, S., Alijani, F., & Bigdeli, I. (2010). Validation of the Social Achievement Goal Orientation Scale in Iranian Students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), (40).
Yeung, E. K. L., Apperly, I. A., & Devine, R. T. (2024). Measures of individual differences in adult theory of mind: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 157, 105481.
Zhu, H., Neubig, G., & Bisk, Y. (2021, July). Few-shot language coordination by modeling theory of mind. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 12901-12911). PMLR.