نقش طرحواره‌های هیجانی، انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی و خودکارآمدی تنظیم هیجانی در پیش‌بینی نشخوار فکری دانشجویان دختر

نویسندگان
مجتبی پورآقا
سامره اسدی مجره
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش طرحواره‌های هیجانی، خودکارآمدی تنظیم هیجانی و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی در پیش‌بینی نشخوار فکری انجام شد. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی ـ همبستگی و مبتنی بر تحلیل رگرسیون گام‌به‌گام بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش را کلیه دانشجویان دختر دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت در نیمسال دوم سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۴–۱۴۰۳ تشکیل دادند که از میان آنان ۴۰۰ نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با استفاده از مقیاس طرحواره‌های هیجانی، مقیاس خودکارآمدی تنظیم هیجانی، مقیاس انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی و مقیاس نشخوار فکری گردآوری و با استفاده از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون گام‌به‌گام تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد بین طرحواره‌های هیجانی و نشخوار فکری رابطه مثبت و معنادار و بین انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی، خودکارآمدی تنظیم هیجانی و نشخوار فکری رابطه منفی و معنادار وجود دارد. همچنین، نتایج رگرسیون گام‌به‌گام نشان داد متغیرهای کنترل، احساس گناه، جایگزین‌ها، ساده‌انگاری هیجان‌ها، سرزنش دیگران و فقدان کنترل به‌طور معناداری نشخوار فکری را پیش‌بینی می‌کنند. در مدل نهایی، کنترل قوی‌ترین رابطه معکوس را با نشخوار فکری داشت؛ درحالی‌که احساس گناه، ساده‌انگاری هیجان‌ها، سرزنش دیگران و فقدان کنترل با نشخوار فکری رابطه مستقیم و جایگزین‌ها با آن رابطه معکوس نشان دادند. این متغیرها در مجموع ۶۱ درصد از واریانس نشخوار فکری را تبیین کردند. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که مؤلفه‌های طرحواره‌های هیجانی، خودکارآمدی تنظیم هیجانی و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی در تبیین و پیش‌بینی نشخوار فکری نقش مهمی دارند. بنابراین، توجه به اصلاح طرحواره‌های هیجانی ناکارآمد، تقویت مهارت‌های تنظیم هیجان و افزایش انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی می‌تواند در طراحی مداخلات روان‌شناختی برای کاهش نشخوار فکری مؤثر باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
نشخوار فکری
طرحواره‌های هیجانی
انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی
خودکارآمدی تنظیم هیجانی

عنوان مقاله English

The role of emotional schemas, cognitive flexibility, and emotional regulation self-efficacy in predicting rumination in female students

نویسندگان English

mojtaba pooragha
samereh Asadi Majareh
چکیده English

The present study was conducted to investigate the role of emotional schemas, emotional regulation self-efficacy, and cognitive flexibility in predicting rumination. This study was applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlational in terms of method and based on stepwise regression analysis. The statistical population of the study consisted of all female students of Islamic Azad University, Rasht Branch, in the second semester of the academic year 2024-2025, from whom 400 people were selected using the convenience sampling method. Data were collected using the Emotional Schemas Scale, Emotional Regulation Self-Efficacy Scale, Cognitive Flexibility Scale, and Rumination Scale and analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient and stepwise regression. The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between emotional schemas and rumination, and a negative and significant relationship between cognitive flexibility, emotional regulation self-efficacy, and rumination. Also, the results of stepwise regression showed that the variables of control, guilt, alternatives, emotional simplification, blaming others, and lack of control significantly predicted rumination. In the final model, control had the strongest inverse relationship with rumination; while guilt, emotional simplification, blaming others, and lack of control showed a direct relationship with rumination, and alternatives showed an inverse relationship with it. These variables explained a total of 61% of the variance in rumination. The research findings show that the components of emotional schemas, emotional regulation self-efficacy, and cognitive flexibility play an important role in explaining and predicting rumination. Therefore, paying attention to correcting dysfunctional emotional schemas, strengthening emotion regulation skills, and increasing cognitive flexibility can be effective in designing psychological interventions to reduce rumination.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Rumination
emotional schemas
cognitive flexibility
emotional regulation self-efficacy
Abedini ,Y. (2021). Metacognition as a core skill for wise decision-making in higher education:investigating gender differences. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Emerald Publishing Limited. 2050-7003 .DOI :10.1108/JARHE-11-2020-0400.
Ardelt M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324.
Asadi, S., Khorshidi, R., Glück, J. (2019). Iranian children’s knowledge about wisdom. Cognitive Development, 52, 100-148.
Ayaz, N., Naeem Butt, M., & Ayaz, S. J.(2023). Metacognition in Learning - New Perspectives. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.113947.
Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (2008). The fascination of wisdom: Its nature, ontogeny, and function. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 56–64.
Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136.
Chan ,D. W.(2008). Teacher self‐efficacy and successful intelligence among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Experimental Educational Psychology. 28,735-746.
Cheraghi, F., Webster, J., Kadivar, P., Asgari, A, Mazlum, F.(2021). Validating the Self-assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) in an Iranian Sample: Psychometric and Developmental Findings. Cross Cultural Gerontol. 36(4),407-29
Coutinho, S. A. (2006). Relation ship between the need for cognition metacognition, and intellectual task performance. Educational Research and Reviews, 1(5), 162-164.
Dafik , M. A.(2019).The analysis of students’ meta cognition in solving local wisdom based mathematical problems and the application of murder strategy to increase their meta cognition ability. OP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 243 012051 IOP Publishing.
Dasta , M., Shokri, O., Pakdaman, SH., Fathabadi, J.(2020). Iranians’ Understanding of Wisdom: The Role of Ethnicity, Gender, Age and Education. Positive Psychology Research, 6,(3)3, 13-32.
Demetriou, A., Liakos, A., & Kizilyürek, N. (2021). How wisdom emerges from intellectual development: A developmental/historical theory for raising Mandelas. Journal of Intelligence, 9(3(,1-15.
Dumbravă, I. L. (2017). An empirical approach to wisdom processes. Romanian Applied Psychology. 19 (2), 50-58.
Ferrari, M., & Kim, J. (2019). Educating for wisdom. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 347-371). Cambridge University Press.
Glück, J. (2020). Intelligence and wisdom. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 1140–1158). Cambridge University Press
Glück, J., Bluck, S. (2013). The MORE Life Experience Model: A theory of the development of personal wisdom. In Ferrari, M., Weststrate, N. M. (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom (pp. 75–98). Springer.
Glück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L.,Straßer, I., & Wiedermann, W. (2013). How to measure wisdom: Content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4
Glück, J., Scherpf, A .(2022.) Intelligence and Wisdom: Age-Related Differences and Nonlinear Relationships. Psychological Aging , 37(5):649-666.
Glück, J., Weststrate, N. M. & Scherpf, A. (2022). Looking beyond linear: A closer examination of the relationship between wisdom and wellbeing. Paper submitted for publication. Happiness Studies,23(1), 3285–3313.
Glück, J., Weststrate, N. M.(2022). The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant : An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(24), 1-15..
Grimm S. R. (2015). Wisdom. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(1), 139–154.
Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233–257.
Grossmann, I., & Brienza, J. P. (2018). The strengths of wisdom provide unique contributions to improved leadership, sustainability, inequality, gross national happiness, and civic discourse in the face of contemporary world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2), 22. Crossref.
Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J. P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M. A., Hu ,C. S., Nusbaum, H.,& Vervaeke, J. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133.
Karami, S ,. Ghahremani, M., Parra-Martinez, F. A.,& Gentry, M. (2020). A Polyhedron Model of Wisdom: A Systematic Review of the Wisdom Studies in Psychology ,Management and Leadership, and Education. Roeper Review. 42,4 .257–241
Kline, R.B.(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kordnoghabi, R, Beiranvand, A. D.(2017). Wisdom, Intelligence, Creativity. International Education and Learning. 6(2),1-20.
Liu, X. L., Huang, R. H., (2016). From Knowledge to Wisdom: Wisdom Education from the Perspective of Real Learning.China Audio-visual Education,13 (3),14-20 .
Mickler, C., Staudinger, U. M. (2008). Personal wisdom: Validation and age-related differences of a performance measure. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 78
7–799.
Negahban Salami, M, Farzad, V, & Sarami, G. (2016). A Study of Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Successful Intelligence Scale. Educational Measurement. 5(15),2-14. [Persian].
Oakes, H., Brienza, J., Elnakouri, A., Grossmann, I. (2019). Wise reasoning: Converging evidence for the psychology of sound judgment. In R.J. Sternberg ., J. Glück .(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 202–225). Cambridge University Press.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Sperling. R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R. & Du Bios ,N. (2004) . Meta cognition and Self-Regulated Learning Constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation 10(2):117-139.
Sternberg , R., J.,Glück, J & Karami, S .(2022). The Psychology of Wisdom. Cambridge University Press. In R.J., Strernberg & J. Gluck. 53-69. Psychological Theories of Wisdom,53-69 .
Sternberg, R, J.( 2003). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J, Grigorenko, E. L. (2002).Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press
Sternberg, R. J. (2011). The theory of successful intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 504–527). Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics. Creativity, and the Arts 12: 50–67
Sternberg, R. J. (2020). The augmented theory of successful intelligence. In Cambridge hand book of intelligence, (2Ed).In R. J. Sternberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2, 679 – 708.
Sternberg, R. J. (2023). Introduction: Intelligence, creativity, and wisdom: A brief intellectual history of the theory and research on their interrelationships. In R. J. Sternberg., J. C. Kaufman, & S. Karami (Eds.), Intelligence, creativity, and wisdom: Exploring their connections and distinctions (. 1-20). Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sternberg, R. J.( 2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Intelligence 7( 23), 1-17.
Sternberg, R. J.(2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Psychology. 39(2):189-202.
Sternberg, R. J., Glaveanu, V., Karami, S., Kaufman, J. C., Phillipson, S. N., & Preiss, D. D. (2021). Meta-intelligence: Understanding, control, and interactivity between creative, analytical, practical, and wisdom-based approaches in problem solving. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 1-11.
Sternberg, R. J., Karami, S. (2021). What is wisdom? A unified 6P framework .Review of General Psychology , 25(2,)134–151.
Teymouri Fard , E., M. Fouladchang, M(2012)A Study on the Effect of Metacognition, Self-Efficacy and Intelligence on the First Grade High School Student's Achievement Studies in Learning & Instruction , 2(4), 120-135[Persian].
Trahan, L. H., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M. & Hiscock, M. (2014). The Flynn effect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1332–1360. Crossref
Webster J. D. (2010). Wisdom and positive psychosocial values in young adulthood. Adult Development, 17(2), 70–80.

Webster J. D. (2019). Self-report wisdom measures: Strengths, limitations, and future directions. In Sternberg R. J., Glück J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 297–320). Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
Webster, J. D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22.
Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. International Aging & Human Development, 65(2), 163–183. Crossref
Webster, J. D., Westerhof, G. J.,& Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2014). Wisdom and mental health across the lifespan. Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 209–218.
Weststrate, N. M. (2019). The mirror of wisdom: Self-reflection as a developmental precursor and core competency of wise people. In Sternberg, R. J., Glück J. (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 500–518). Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
Zhang, K ., Shi, J . , Wang, F & Ferrari, M .(2022). Wisdom: Meaning, structure, types, arguments, and future concerns. Current Psychology,1- 22.