Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Dispositions to Critical Thinking Inventory (DCTI) among a normal sample of Iranian students. The present study is a correlation study. The population of the study consisted all students of Tehran’s universities (Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran University, and Shahed University). 330 students (175 females, 155 males) were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling. At first, the inventory was translated through double translation method and verified by the specialists. To assess construct validity, the exploratory factor analysis as well as internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was used. To assess the convergent validity, the correlation coefficients between the DCTI and the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI) was used. Finally, in order to assess the reliability of the questionnaire, the test-retest after 2 weeks (N=40) and Cronbach’s coefficients were employed. Results from factor analysis and varimax rotation to determine construct validity showed that this inventory was saturated by three factors, innovativeness, maturity and commitment. To investigate its convergence validity, the results of correlation scores of the dispositions of critical thinking with the California critical thinking skills test score showed that the correlation between the critical thinking skills score and the California critical thinking skills test score was not significant, but it had a significant relationship with the two other factors. Using the internal consistency method, the Cronbach’s alpha for each of the subscales was calculated and following results obtained: 0.61 for innovativeness subscale, 0.38 for maturity, and 0.81 for commitment, which indicates dispositions to the critical thinking subscales had a positive and significant correlation with each other and with the total score of the inventory (r = 0.75). The obtained results of test-retest scores after one-week interval and internal correlation coefficient were calculated as follows: 0.564 for creativity, 0.372 for maturity, and 0.682 for commitment subscales.

According to the results of the present study, the DCTI can be used for educational and research goals in Iranian population.
Keywords

Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, 11(4), 361-375.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52.
Eichhorn, R. (2002). Developing thinking skills: critical thinking at the Army Management Staff College. Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. Educational leadership, 43(2), 44-48.
Ennis,H.(2002).A, Super-Strealined conception of critical thinking.university of Illinois.in: http://www.critical thinking.net/ssConcCt. html.
Facion, P. A., Facion, N. C. (1993). The california critical thinking skills test: form A and Form B, Test Manual Millbrae. CA: California Academic Press. pp.1-30.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations.
Facione, P. A. (2007). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 2007, 1-23.
Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A.,(2001). California Critical Thinking Disposition Administrative and Policy Studies School of Education.Retrieved on Jan.14 2008 from http:// etd.library.
Ferret, S. (1997). What Is Critical Thinking ? Jownolof Startegies For Success, Critical Reading. Startegies, 21(50).
Gelerstein, D., del Río, R., Nussbaum, M., Chiuminatto, P., & López, X. (2016). Designing and implementing a test for measuring critical thinking in primary school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 40-49.
Gharib, Mitra. Rabian, Mostafa. Hajizade, Ebrahim. (2010). Critical thinking skills in first and last term students of Health Services Management. Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences. 9(2), 125-135. [Persian]
Halpern, D. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
HeydarAli, Hooman. (2005). Statistical inference in behavioral research. Tehran. Samt. [Persian]
HeydarAli, Hooman. (2001). Scientific Method in Behavioral Sciences. Tehran. Parsa. [Persian]
Khalili, Hossein. Solymani, Mohsen. (2004). Reliability, validity and norm of California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Babol Medical Sciences. 2, 84-90. [Persian]
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson's Research Reports,6,40-41.
Marques, J. F. (2012). Moving from Trance to Think: Why We Need to Polish Our Critical Thinking Skills?. International Journal of Leadership Studies7, 1, 87-95.
Marsha, L. (1996) Critical thinking as an educational outcome, An evaluation of current tools of measurement. Nurse Educator, 21(30), 22-26.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Harvard University Press.
Page, Diana. (2007). Promotion critical- thinking skills by using negation Exercises. Journal of education for business, 82(5), 251-257.
Pishegar, Azar. (2004). Relationship between learning styles and critical thinking in Humanities and engineering students of Tehran universities. Master Thesis. Allame tabatabaei University. [Persian]
Ricketts, J. C. (2003). The efficacy of leadership development, critical thinking dispositions, and student academic performance on the critical thinking skills of selected youth leaders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).
Riddell, T. (2007). Critical assumptions: Thinking critically about critical thinking. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(3). 110-115.
Santrock, J. W. (2010). Educational Psychology. Tata McGrAW-Hill Publishin Company Limited. New Delhi. pp:288-289
Shabani, Hasan. (2004). Advanced Teaching Method. Tehran. Samt. [Persian]
Smith-Stone, Marilyn. (1997). Critical thinking activates for nursing Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & wikins press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Critical Thinking in Psychology. Cambridge University Press.