اثر کنترل توجه بر سرگردانی ذهن

نویسندگان
فاطمه زهرا مرادی
سیاوش طالع پسند
اسحق رحیمیان بوگر
دانشگاه سمنان
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش بررسی اثر کنترل توجه بر سرگردانی ذهن می­باشد. روش این پژوهش به صورت نیمه آزمایشی بوده است. جامعه­ی آماری شامل دانش­آموزان دختر پایه­ی پنجم و ششم ابتدایی شهر سمنان در سال تحصیلی 1400-1401 است. تعداد 38 نفر از افراد جامعه­ی آماری به صورت در دسترس محاسبه شد که به جهت پیش بینی افت آزمودنی­ها یا از دست رفتن داده­ها، 2 نفر از تعداد نمونه­ی محاسبه شده بیشتر در مطالعه حضور داشتند. ابزار اندازه­گیری سرگردانی ذهن آزمون استروپ بود که در شرایط کنترل توجه فعال و واکنشی تکمیل شد. داده­ها با استفاده از تحلیل واریانس یک عاملی اندازه­گیری مکرر و توسط نرم افزار SPSS25 تحلیل شدند. یافته­ها نشان داد که سرگردانی ذهن در شرایط کنترل توجه فعال بیشتر از شرایط کنترل توجه واکنشی است. یافته های این مطالعه می تواند در شناخت پدیده سرگردانی ذهن بینش مفیدی به دست دهد. معلمین و طراحان آموزشی می­توانند با داشتن دانش مربوط به این زمینه اقدام به طراحی و تولید محتواهای آموزشی­ای کنند که دانش­آموزان در طی آموزش مجازی که کمترین نظارت از سوی معلم در جریان یادگیری اتفاق می­افتد، منجر به تجربه­ی سرگردانی ذهن کمتر از سوی دانش­آموزان شود.


کلیدواژه‌ها
سرگردانی ذهن
کنترل توجه
کارکردهای اجرایی

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of attention control on mind wandering

نویسندگان English

Fateme Zahra Moradi
Siavash Talepasand
Isaac Rahimian Boogar
Semnan University
چکیده English

The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of attention control on mind wandering. The method of this research was semi-experimental. The statistical population includes fifth and sixth grade female students of Semnan city in the academic year of 1400-1401. The number of 38 people from the statistical population was calculated as available, and in order to predict the drop of the subjects or the loss of data, 2 people were present in the study more than the number of the calculated sample. The tool used to measure mind wandering was the Stroop test, which was completed under active and reactive attention control conditions. The data were analyzed using one-factor analysis of variance and repeated measurement by SPSS25 software. The findings showed that mind wandering is more in active attention control conditions than in reactive attention control conditions. The findings of this study can provide useful insight in understanding the phenomenon of mind wandering. Teachers and educational designers, having the knowledge related to this field, can design and produce educational content that students will experience during virtual education, where the minimum supervision by the teacher takes place during the learning process. The wandering of the mind will be less on the part of the students.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

mind wandering
attention control
executive function
Bialystok, E., Poarch, G., Luo, L. & Craick, F. M. (2014). Effects of bilingualism and aging on executive function and working memory. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 696-705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037254
Carriere, J. & Seli, P. (2013). Wandering in Both Mind and Body: Individual Differences in Mind Wandering and Inattention Predict Fidgeting. Canadian. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67 (1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031438
Cherry, J., McCormack, T. & Graham, A. J. (2022). The link between mind wandering and learning in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,Volume 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105367
Cohen, J. E. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 331–335. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196169
Figueiredo, T., Lima, G., Erthal, P., et al. (2020). Mind-wandering, depression, anxiety and ADHD: Disentangling the relationship. Psychiatry Res, 285, 112798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112798
Kane, M.J. & Engle, R.W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology,132, 47–70. [PubMed: 12656297]
Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932-938. DOI: 10.1126/science.1192439
Klinger, E. (2009). Daydreaming and fantasizing: Thought flow and motivation. In: Markman, KD.; Klein, WMP.; Suhr, JA., editors. Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. New York: Psychology Press, 2009. p. 225-239.
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). What Mind Wandering Reveals About Executive-Control Abilities and Failures. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 348–354. DOI:10.1177/0963721412454875
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in re-search and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
Özsoy G & Ataman A. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem-solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 67-82.
Podda, J., Tocchino, A., et all. (2022). Mind wandering in people with multiple sclerosis: a psychometric study. Journal Pre-proof, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.10352.
Roberts, R. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1996). An interactive framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12, 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649609540642
Schooler, J., W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T., C., Reichle, E., D., & Sayette, M., A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006
Seli, P., Evan, F.R., Smilek, D. & Schacter, D.L. (2016). Mind-Wandering with and Without Intention. Trends in cognitive sciences, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010
Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cam-bridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946.
Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., Schooler, J., W. (2007). The lights are on but no one's home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14:527–533. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194102
Swanson, L. H., Lussier, C. M. & Orosco, M. J. (2015). Cognitive Strategies, Working Memory, and Growth in Word Problem Solving in Children with Math Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4): 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498771
Teasdale, J.D., Dritschel, B.H., Taylor, M.J., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C.A., Nimmo-Smith, I., Baddeley, A.D. (1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory & Cognition, 23, 551–559. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197257
Videbech, P., Ravnkilde, B., Gammelgaard, L., Egander, A., Clemmensen, K., Rasmussen, N.A., Gjedde, A. & Rosenberg, R. (2004). The Danish PET/depression project: Performance on Stroop's test linked to white matter lesions in the brain. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 130(2): 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2003.10.002
Watkins E., R. (2008). The constructive and unconstructive consequences of repetitive thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134:163–206. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163