نقش میانجی کنترل توجه در رابطه بین حل مسئله و همدلی

نویسندگان
مریم عباسی
سیدموسی طباطبایی
دانشگاه سمنان
چکیده
همدلی جزئی جدانشدنی از رفاه اجتماعی-عاطفی افراد است. این ظرفیت نقش مثبتی در یادگیری اجتماعی، در سراسر طول عمر افراد دارد و شناسایی فرایندهای شناختی که زیربنای همدلی را تشکیل می دهند، امری ضروریست. این پژوهش به منظور بررسی نقش میانجی کنترل توجه در رابطه بین حل مسئله و همدلی انجام شد. روش تحقیق این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی بود. شرکت کنندگان این پژوهش، شامل 500 نفر از کلیه دانشجویان شهر زاهدان بودند که با روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای، انتخاب شدند. به منظور جمع‌آوری داده ها از پرسشنامه حل مسئله هپنر و پترسن ، مقیاس کنترل توجه ، پرسشنامه همدلی جولیف و فارینگتون استفاده شد. برای تجزیه وتحلیل داده‌ها از روش‌های آمار توصیفی و استنباطی ازجمله همبستگی پیرسون و مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای spss و Amos به کار رفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد مسیر مستقیم حل مساله به کنترل توجه (458/0-) منفی و معنادار است. مسیر مستقیم کنترل توجه به همدلی عاطفی شناختی (141/0-) منفی و معنادار است. مسیر مستقیم حل مساله به همدلی عاطفی شناختی (440/0-) منفی و معنادار است. همچنین، اثر میانجی حل مساله بر همدلی عاطفی شناختی از طریق کنترل توجه برابر با 072/0 است که مثبت و معنادار است. بنابراین نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد توجه به نقش واسطه ای کنترل توجه در رابطه حل مسئله و همدلی حائز اهمیت است و می‌بایست به محدودیت‌هایی که ممکن است در اثر افزایش کنترل توجه برای حل مسئله و همدلی ایجاد شود، دقت کرد. به لحاظ نظری نیز بررسی آثار افزایش این کارکردهای شناختی بر همدلی نیازمند تفحص و پژوهش بیشتر است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
حل مسئله
کنترل توجه
همدلی شناختی
همدلی عاطفی

عنوان مقاله English

The mediating role of attentional control in the relationship between problem solving and empathy

نویسندگان English

Maryam Abbasi
Seyed Mosa Tabatabaee
Semnan University
چکیده English

Empathy is an inseparable part of social-emotional people. It plays a positive role in society, throughout people's lives, and recognizing that it forms the basis of empathy is essential. This research was conducted in order to investigate the mediating role of attention control in the relationship between problem solving and empathy. The research method of this study was descriptive-correlation. The participants of this research included 500 students of Zahedan city who were selected by cluster sampling method. In order to collect data, Hepner and Petersen's problem solving questionnaire, attention control scale, Jolliffe and Farrington's empathy questionnaire were used. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods such as Pearson correlation and structural equation modeling were used to analyzethe data using spss and Amos software. The findings showed that the direct path of problem solving to attention control (-0.458) is negative and significant. The direct path of controlling attention to cognitive emotional empathy (-0.141) is negative and significant. The direct path of problem solving to cognitive emotional empathy (-0.440) is negative and significant. Also, the mediating effect of problem solving on cognitive emotional empathy through attention control is equal to 0.072, which is positive and significant. Therefore, the research results show that it is important to pay attention to the mediating role of attention control in the relationship between problem solving and empathy, and it is necessary to pay attention to the limitations that may be caused by increasing attention control for problem solving and empathy. Theoretically, investigating the effects of increasing thesecognitive functions on empathy requires more investigation and research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

problem solving
attentional control
cognitive empathy
affective empathy
AY.F, Polat, S., & Kashimi, T. (2020). Relationship between the problem-solving skills and empathy skills of operating room nurses. Journal of Nursing Research, 28(2), 1-10.
Bartlett, J., Kotrlik, J. & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriation samplesize in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance Journal, 1 (19), 43- 50.
de Waal FBM, Preston SD) 2017( Mammalian empathy: behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nat. Rev.Neurosci. 18(8). 498–509.
DeCaro, M. S. (2014). Enclothed cognition and controlled attention during insight problem-solving. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 8.‌
DeCaro, M. S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). The benefits and perils of attentional control. Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action, 51-73.‌
DeCaro, M. S., Van Stockum, C. A., Jr., & Wieth, M. B. (2016). When higher working memory capacity hinders insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(1), 39–49.
DeJong, H., Fox, E., & Stein, A. (2019). Does rumination mediate the relationship between attentional control and symptoms of depression?. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 63, 28-35.‌
Depow, G. J., Francis, Z., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). The experience of empathy in everyday life. Psychological Science, 32(8), 1198-1213.
Duncker, K. (1945) On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, (58) American Psychological Association.
Fliss, R., Le Gall, D., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Chauvir´e, V., Desgranges, B., & Allain, P. (2016). Theory of mind and social reserve: Alternative hypothesis of progressive theory of mind decay during different stages of Alzheimer's disease. Social Neuroscience, 11(4),409–423.
Frances A. Conners (2009). Attentional control and the Simple View of reading. , 22(5), 591–613. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x
Frick, P. J., & Kemp, E. C. (2021). Conduct disorders and empathy development. Annual review of clinical psychology, 17, 391-416.‌
Goodhew, S. C., & Edwards, M. (2021). Attentional control both helps and harms empathy. Cognition, 206, 104505.‌
Goodhew, S. C., & Edwards, M. (2022). The relationship between cognitive failures and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 111384.‌
Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(1), 66–75.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of adolescence, 29(4), 589-611.‌
Judah, M. R., Grant, D. M., Mills, A. C., & Lechner, W. V. (2013). Factor structure and validation of the attentional control scale. Cognition and Emotion, 28(3), 433–451.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.‌
Lin, X., Zhang, X., Liu, Q., Zhao, P., Zhang, H., Wang, H., & Yi, Z. (2021). Theory of mindin adults with traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 121, 106–118.
Mayer, R. E. (2003) Learning and instruction, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, NJ.
Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2006). Problem solving. Handbook of educational psychology, 2, 287-303.‌
Montague, M. (2007). Self-regulation and mathematics instruction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 75-83.
Morelli, S. A., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). The role of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy for happiness, sadness, and anxiety. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 160.‌
Pinar, S. E., Yildirim, G., & Sayin, N. (2018). Investigating the psychological resilience, self-confidence and problem -solving skills of midwife candidates. Nurse education today, 64, 144 -149.
Spinrad, T. L., & Eisenberg, N. (2017). Prosocial behavior and empathy-related responding: relations to Children’s well-being. In The happy mind: cognitive contributions to well-being. 331-347.
Thoma, P., Sonnenburg, S., Marcinkowski, N., Juckel, G., Edel, M.-A., & Suchan, B. (2019). Social problem solving in adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 112721.
von Bastian, C. C., Blais, C., Brewer, G., Gyurkovics, M., Hedge, C., Kałamała, P., ... & Wiemers, E. (2020). Advancing the understanding of individual differences in attentional control: Theoretical, methodological, and analytical considerations.‌
Watanabe, T., & Sasaki, Y. (2015). Perceptual learning: toward a comprehensive theory. Annual review of psychology, 66, 197-221.‌
Weisz, E., & Cikara, M. (2021). Strategic regulation of empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(3), 213-227.‌
Weisz, E., & Zaki, J. (2018). Motivated empathy: a social neuroscience perspective. Current opinion in psychology, 24, 67-71.‌
Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. In Psychology of learning and motivation (56). 185-227. Academic Press.‌
Winter, K., Spengler, S., Bermpohl, F., Singer, T., & Kanske, P. (2017). Social cognition in aggressive offenders: Impaired empathy, but intact theory of mind. Scientific reports, 7(1), 1-10.‌
Yan, Z., Hong, S., Liu, F., & Su, Y. (2020). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between empathy and executive function. PsyCh journal, 9(1), 34-43.‌
Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608–1647.